i remember a friend at the school who tell me that for every toke i smoke mi brain loses millions of cells well let me go and try to kill myself :jointsmile:
also check this funny clip
Printable View
i remember a friend at the school who tell me that for every toke i smoke mi brain loses millions of cells well let me go and try to kill myself :jointsmile:
also check this funny clip
The funniest I heard was from a cop who told me that marijuana eats my brain from the inside.. isn't my brain 'the inside'? Anyways.. I found that really funny.
ahaha and once
me : Dude remember the address
friend : don't you know it already?
me : yes
friend : then *cough*
me : For backup
that was funny, especially since we were both crisp.
drinking a lot milk makes it impossible to fail a drug test
i was in art class back in the day i didnt really smoke weed at the time but i wasnt retarded but this kid said that chronic means its from the female plant, even though i didnt smoke i asked him if he were retarded
haha, this probably wont make ANY sense to anyone out there, but it made sense to my buddie and me when we were leaned out of out minds.
so i tell my buddy that its midnight (i dont remember why but it doesnt matter)
so he stands up looks me straight in the eye and says "WAIT" walks out of the room comes back with three building blocks. he sits down infront of me crosslegged and just sits there for a second
then he goes "uhhhhh wait...what was i doing"
and i start to say something and he goes "SHHHH SHHHH SHHHHHH, IM TALKING...ME"
but then sits there for another what seemed like twenty min. (really like 1) then procedes to rearange the blocks and explain how one block is one day's midnight and the other block is the other day's midnight, and he begins to rearange them and ends up just putting one down, then picking it up and putting the other one down in EXACTLY the same place. i got up to change the song that was playing, got distracted by the music and ended up sitting on my couch doing nothing, then i look at the clock and its 1 o'clock
i look over and my buddy is still sitting there picking up one block and putting the other one down in the same place. I just look at him and say "hey bro, hows it goin"
he looks up and just had this HUGE grin on his face, we both just CRACK UP, then we go outside and smoke the rest of our bag.
best night of my life.
Yeah, but that doesn't necessarily prove the rule. I smoke a pack a day and I have low blood pressure. This is not the norm. Not saying you're wrong, just saying, it's a poor argument to make that because something affects or doesn't affect you in a particular way, it must be globally true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frickr
---
I just find it funny whenever I see an anti-weed image or commercial or whatever. It's amusing that they try to stress that it's not cool, even though the vast, vast majority of users never make a claim that it is cool. Over a substantial timeline (i.e. ignoring one-time users or first-time users), people do it because they want to, and for no other reason -- and stoners, I notice in general, could give half a sh*t whether people think they're cool. Weed is not like a particular brand of clothing or a genre of music. Something that affects you as much as weed is never going to be something pursued consistently just to uphold an image. Maybe the first time or two a drug like weed or tobacco might be taken largely due to peer pressure or to see how it affects your image (in addition to how it makes you feel), but no one's going to keep it up as a front: they either like it and continue, or don't like it and discontinue. The anti-drug campaign's largest fallacy is the image that somewhere, perhaps in your neighborhood, a teenager is being forced to get high, as though drugs were abundant, cheap, and obtained as easily as soft drinks, and as though drug users have nothing better to do than try to force the weak to use substances with them.
In one of the "talking dog" commercials (which are especially amusing because they're animated like children drew them, as if first graders were commonly offered weed), a person is about to smoke a joint but feels badly about it and asks his dog to smoke with him so he feels better. The dog disapproves, the person cries, and with any luck the person decides to make the right decision and not smoke... but the reason it's the right decision for him is because, clearly shown from his misgivings about smoking as well as his possible unresolved emotional issues (not to mention the fact that he can hold conversation with his dog), he's obviously not at all into it and doesn't enjoy it much. The commercial succeeds in sending an incredibly obvious message: if you try weed and don't like it, don't continue using it. The people who try it and don't like it are almost universally going to discontinue use in the first place, though! Meanwhile, the people who try it and like it and want to use it again aren't going to listen to the commercial anyway (because they've made their decision already), but actually are totally justified in shrugging it off as an irrelevant ad, since the message in it really isn't even aimed at the people who enjoy getting stoned. The ad neither presents relevant information to the experienced smoker nor discourages the nonsmoker from trying weed once. It will presumably affect the decisions of a small amount of individuals with weak constitutions who are easily swayed by advertising in the first place, but outside of that the commercial has no real point, because all other target audiences' behaviors are basically unaffected by the ad, and would be the same even if the ad was never created and aired. This upsets me cheifly because I know that in all likelihood my tax money was used to make this Captain Obvious of 20-second spots.