thought so...how long you been back?
Printable View
thought so...how long you been back?
goin on about 9 months.
If that dumb ass Bush had given you guys back up in Afganistan you would have gotten Bin Laden by now... thanks for trying though :)
yeah thats what i was hitting on in that old thread...the focus got shifted elsewhere...i think this was his plan the whole time, but who knows, not much i can do about it now :confused:
remember...bush has said now that bin laden isn't important, we don't need to get him...forget about bin laden...that was after he said he was our number one priority and after he said he never said bin laden wasn't a priority...
what a line of shit he fed us huh.
Did a little research on the Pentigon plane crash. The next link shows a US F4 Phantom Jet testing the strength of a concrete wall built to withstand a nuclear blast by crashing into it at 500 MPH. Remember now, Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon travelling at approximately 530mph.
http://www.big-boys.com/articles/concreteplane.html
Ahhhhh, but what was the construction of the Pentagon? I'm sure it wasn't Nuclear Power Station durable like shown in the link. No it wasn't, but the plane did punch not one but several holes ....possible atomizing on the way as demonstrated by the jet? So what was the strength of the Pentagon walls?
Heeeeere ya go.
http://www.architectureweek.com/2001/1003/news_1-1.html
And here's an article put out by the BBC....I'm sure their out of good graces with someone or other...but its just like all the others I found on the net. Funny though...under my search I couldn't find anything of proof that the calls made to loved ones were false. In the very first post on this thread it was implied that maybe these folk were like Jihad martyrs for Bush. Don't know about everyone else but my parents taught me to give proper respect to the dead.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...613.stm#second
In conclusion....I guess this would be considered the "dreaded republican view" LOL
http://www.september11news.com/Flight93.htm
Have a nice day :D
Quote:
It's called "sarcasm". I checked out one of your and pissants sites...Prison Planet. What a fuckin joke! Pod missle shot at southern WTC building before collision. GET FUCKIN REAL!!!
Why were parts in the lawn...maybe because of the explosion from the fuel tanks?
Why isn't the plane intact so dumbasses can see it. What do ya think happens to metal going at a speed of 500MPH through several brick walls reinforced with rebarb? HMMMMMM Ever see a car go through a shredder. It comes out in dime size bits and all the seats, dash, non-metals turns into dust. Don't believe me? Go to Wilton Iowa, they have a very nice car shredder there.
Do you happen to recall when the terrorist dumbasses tried to take down the WTC by loading a van with explosives and blowing it up next to a major support. Building didn't budge! THANK GOD FOR THE NEWS THOUGH!!! I remember telling the wife at the time that these people laid out the plans. U.S. news brought on the engineering experts and they stated that in order to bring down that structure..... Fuckers laid out EXACTLY what would have to be done! "there's absolutely no way some tinpot terrorists could have pulled this off alone, or without assistance from the military industrial complex." Military industrial complex my ass! Thank the news!
Get a grip you say. I think you and pissant should lay off the sativa, paranoia will destroy ya!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
I was going to respond individually but why waste time when i could just refute you in one go...yet again..*sigh*. The pod missle may or may not be true. we don't know. we only have theories. but then again, electricity was a theory and oil being used to fuel automobiles was a theory as well. Unless you have enough to build on, every idea is theoretical. You can't call him a joke because he doesn't do what he's outraging against....shutting down other opinions and calling them lunatics.
Funny you should mention parts being on the lawn from an explosion. Last time I checked white-hot pieces of metal tend to singe soft pliable grass when touched. If you looked at the pictures the anti-conspiracists used then how come you didnt ask why the grass is the exact same lofty green over every square inch...not even discolored from all the fuel-soaked enviromentally choking debris that people were still looking at days later.
Yes I have seen cars go through shredders....machines designed to chop cars into tiny bits. Nice attempt at a feasible comparison though. I think that a machine going at 500 miles an hour through brick walls whould have left a huge pile of crunched up metal and the recognizings of a plane. I can safely affirm this because contrary to poular belief, other planes have crashed prior to 9/11. Dare I say even AA planes. But yet somehow, this one almost completely disintegrated. Also, many of your "witnesses" say they saw a piece of the nose and stuff. Now you're trapped because you're caught between believing them and re-affirming my question of where are the pics to prove it and believing me and having to admit maybe you didnt think things through quite as thoroughly as you thought. Owned.
Of course the building didn't budge. Any half-wit knows that unless the bombs are strapped right onto the support the energy discharge would have been significantly reduced with respect to its effect on structural integrity. However, you keep forgetting that people were warned about staying away. Like it or not, the same politicians you bend over for admitted to having at least some vague prior knowledge. Since that's the case how come the emergency rescue wasn't more well thought out? You can say they didnt let people know because of the emergency evacuations would be hell without credible evidence, but if they had warnings and the rescues were so sloppy it means they didnt care. And Alex Jones is the lunatic?
You can sit there with that ignorant article written by some soccer mom living in the suburbs without a care in the fucking world. First off, her capitalist claim will never hold up in a one-on-one interview. I've personally listened to his show alot of times at work and anytime when he promotes his videos he ALWAYS tells people to buy it. That's completely true. BUT your soccer mom forgot to mention that he also tells people to buy one copy and make COPIES of that copy for others to SHARE for FREEEEEEEEEE. Yeh, REAL capitalist. From what I've seen, he clearly states that if you decide to buy more than one you're only doing it to support the website because it costs MONEY to run. I dont think he'll be applying for any government grants either. So once again, Psycho things arent always so black and white and the people fighting for your freedoms isn't as unpatriotic as the perfect Bush admin. would have you believe.
http://www.big-boys.com/articles/concreteplane.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by nicholasstanko
Did you watch the film....Oh my god, see the plane turn into dust! You call Bush supporters "blind followers" but yet you follow Alex Jones with the same zeal as those you downgrade.
Is film enough proof or do you have to consult with Alex first?
Why do you provide links that anyone with a synapse could figure out? Your test is void. Let's not forget the plane supposedly FLEW into the pentagon, the jet they tested was rolling straight forward on WHEELS. Now you're trapped AGAIN because you're stuck between fundamentally flawed notion and the speculation that it could have skidded on the ground...which means it would have had to do so on the nice green lawn that was undamaged....this is frustrating. Also, you forget that fighter jets are aeronamically designed to withstand surface to air fire which means they are made a WHOLE lot more durably than a commercial airliner. Jesus Christ, how did it ever occur to you to use this as an arguement? If you can't figure out what's going on think like this...would you use an SUV crashing into a brick wall to determine whether or not a Beetle could punch holes into it at 90 mph?Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
You posted that article i had already read before talking about reinforced concrete. SO WHAT? if it was serious journalist reporting we would have gotten the figures for tensile strength and so forth. That was just a quick "there there it's okay". because we all know that the pentagon was built perfectly and didn't need remodifications like they were doing prior. I noticed that noone bothered to question how coincidental it was that they were doing work in a closed off section of the pentagon that noone was allowed to go into. The very same section that got hit. Owned.
I never said the calls made were false. I implied that we shouldnt be ignorant to the fact that they could easily have been falsified. You also forget that we didn't hear any of these tapes until well after it all happened. As for respecting the dead, i guess im wrong then for wanting to delve into every possible question to reassure every person that their deaths werent based on a lie. You seem keen to respect the dead but also mighty intent on forgetting them.