He should sign it, hell they found a video of him smoking a joint when he was younger :p.
I swear, if I dont get the privilege to move to Canada I'm moving to Cali. Big things are happening over there :).
Printable View
He should sign it, hell they found a video of him smoking a joint when he was younger :p.
I swear, if I dont get the privilege to move to Canada I'm moving to Cali. Big things are happening over there :).
LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER! :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamlet
arnold has 3 choices. he can sign it, veto it, or the bill can become a law without his signature. 2/3 ain't bad. i just hope ignorance doesn'twin this battle.
I'd rather him NOT sign it than veto it!:thumbsup:
I think that the bill signing may be getting close, Arnold is doing something with renewable energy today.
THAT'S GOOD NEWS! LET'S HOPE HE CONSIDERS THE BILL!Quote:
Originally Posted by phytokind
Hope all that 0.01% THC hemp production doesn't pollinate any of the good smokeable outdoor stuff grown in CA. But of course it will. I kinda hope my state doesn't legalize hemp-growing, as I don't really want shitloads of low-THC pollen floating around onto my ladies. Heh.
If the feds were smart enough to realize how badly hemp production would cut into the quality and quantity of outdoor-grown cannabis, they'd be all over this, and spreading legalized hemp across the country. Good thing they're idiots. ;)
I do not think it will end prohibition for recreational use but it will cause an avalanche of other states growing it as well. As an example, S. Dakota has had hemp legalized for a long time. The only reason they didn't start is because the feds, in particular the DEA, said they would prosecute the farmers under federal law. With property seizure laws that is no idle threat.
One effect that bringing back hemp will do is re-educate people about the real history of this plant and it's uses. Then maybe people will realize just how badly we got screwed when they prohibited it in the first place. Goin' to be some irate people when that happens.
Another is growing it for fuel. Legalizing it means that hemp will be grown for fuel, giving California's farmers a shot at a $60 billion a year market. Ethanol from hemp will compete very favorably against oil. There are advantages to car companies in not having to retool their entire plants, billions in savings to them. According to Popular Mechanics (May 2006) The Truth About Biofuels, they state that in order to replace oil with ethanol from corn we "would need to dedicate 675 million acres, or 71% or our nations farmland, to growing feedstock." Corn produces roughly 300 gallons per acre and needs pesticides and herbicides. Hemp produces over 1000 gallons (using 1890's technology) and needs no chemicals. This means that 71%/3.1= 22.9% of our farmland for hemp to achieve the same goal. That would mean stopping the farming "soil bank" and having that land dedicated instead to hemp.
We could all drive SUV's to our hearts content. If fuel prices rise we would just grow more. Many people believe this is why "marijuana" is illegal today.
I wouldn't be too concerned about the low THC hemp pollinating drug plants because the low THC stuff supposedly won't fare too well in the hot sunny California climate very well, as the resin protects Cannabis from the sun, so they may be forced to use hemp with a somewhat higher THC content. And think about it, the whole reason that the feds don't want hemp growing is that you can't really test all plants for THC content, so they just classify all hemp as drug plants. The great thing about this bill is that it defies the feds in this regard. And think about this, what if the drug plants cause the hemp plants to have higher THC? Then they'll just have to live with higher THC. The plant that does best in the California environment is the one that will survive, and that plant won't be the ultra low THC strain, at least not after a few seasons of hemp farming.
Well, has anyone heard anything about it being signed yet? Any news?
By the way phytokind, I'm not sure where you got the idea that low THC plants will grow better in Cali than standard hemp. They grow hemp in the middle east, so I fail to see why it wouldn't do well in California's sunshine. Do you have any information or studies to show for the info? Thanks.