-froooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn-
Printable View
-froooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn-
his parents... :D and their origonal roots are god... :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by ADaisyChain
sort of self created i guess, but you must realize, we are like the sims, we are limited in our ability to comprehend the greatness of our creater.Quote:
Originally Posted by ADaisyChain
it is that our computer is a 5 GHz processer, but in order to render our creater, we need a 500GHz processer. (and by the time our creater can make a 5ooGHz processer for us, our creater will need a 500THz! lol)
wherever it begins.Quote:
Originally Posted by ADaisyChain
and will wright said "let us create the sims in our image"... :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by ADaisyChain
If our creator doesn't need a creator... why do we? Why can't we just 'exist miraculously' the same way people think he does?
DOES NOT COMPUTE.
WARNING: MELTDOWN
lawling/waiting
im not saying our creater doesnt need a creater
im saying that we lack the resources to compute what our creator is, let alone it's origons.
bu tmy theory is it is a frequent mirror, god created man, created sims, created ai???... etc.
:(
Talking in circles.
Oh well, not a big deal. I'm almost sober anyway, so I'm gonna be leaving soon.
Debating with you is really bad ssw.
I'll say it though...
If our creator needs a creator, then our creators creator needs a creator, who also needs a creator, who in turn, also needs a creator. And so on for infinity. And if this is true, since humans can't comprehend it... how would you know?
How many of you have spent more than an hour praying this week?
for one to know the globe, they must walk forever in circles, as it is constantly changing.
to debate with me is to debate with the collective of mind, a universe of possibilities.
Well then stop talking like you know, it makes things more confusing.
Preface your 'possibilities' with
"well it's possible that...."
instead of jumping right in and stating your possibilities as fact. If I knew you just thought of them as theories, and didn't actually believe you had any proof behind them beyond a guess, I wouldn't keep inquiring.
And if you presented them as POSSIBILITIES instead of as fact, debating with you would be interesting, rather then annoying. Because 99% of the time I read your possibilities stated as fact and think "How can he possibly think he has proof of this rather then just taking a guess like everyone else is?"
I'm sober and leaving. Peas.