no connection?zarqawi fled to iraq after being shot in afghanistan and set up a training camp about a year and half before we went in.BOOM,CONNECTION.
not to mention his admitted paying of suicide bombers families in Palestine./connection number 2.
Printable View
no connection?zarqawi fled to iraq after being shot in afghanistan and set up a training camp about a year and half before we went in.BOOM,CONNECTION.
not to mention his admitted paying of suicide bombers families in Palestine./connection number 2.
i promise we have 1000's of undrecover agents in all those countries.those are the people who die and you NEVER hear about.but they are there.
we have a long,long way to go with our spy network because it was destroyed in the 90's.gee thanks.
HE WENT TO IRAQ AFTER BEING SHOT IN AFGHANISTAN/ Thats what im saying!Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
We were in iraq before he got shot. he didnt bite a bullet and then move to iraq and take over the government. stop being silly. if you want to use that then what about the lybian syrian iranian...terrorists that cross over into iraq now on a daily basis?
[QUOTE=amsterdam]i promise we have 1000's of undrecover agents in all those countries.those are the people who die and you NEVER hear about.but they are there.
QUOTE]
Well goin by what happend in london, THEY ARE DOING A SHIT JOB THAT AINT WORTH A CRAP
actually we werent there yet,we were still wasting that year at the U.N.(1 WHOLE YEAR)
shall i post some more pics of some of those dead terrorists that try to cross the border from operation arrowhead about a month ago.
this isnt gonna be some band-aid war.it gonna be LONG and hard.but we will win.i agree,we need to do more with those borders.i would send up about 2000 snipers and give them the green light to shoot on sight people sneaking across.
whats your plan?
That's a better plan than just bombing everything. It still isnt that great because where would the engagement rules lie? we have soldiers now that snipe little kids thinking they might have a bomb on them.Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
did innocent people die in the bombing?YES.
i donate alot of money to the adopt a sniper and i am happy with their role.perhaps they wouldnt have to shoot them if the cowards didnt use them to carry arms or use children with downsyndrome to become bombs.
i am not even sure what the bombing everything comment was about.we were actually picking out what windows to shoot the missle through and what direction the blast should blow.i am sure some innocents were killed but saying we bombed everything is wrong.damned if you do ,damned if you dont.oh well.
im starting to see where youre coming from. the logic is a bit off in my opinion but hey...what can ya do.Quote:
Originally Posted by amsterdam
on the alex jones show they have a british guest on the line talking about the british wont be behind blair. im not saying its gospel but alot of people are getting pissed on a large scale and i dont think they're going to fal for the "go git em" approach the way americans do.
When I refer to "they" I mean AlQueda and associates. We could be doing nothing but good and "they" would still see us as the bad guys do to our religious beliefs.Quote:
Originally Posted by nicholasstanko
What country at the present time would really be a challenge to us..only two. Russia and China. With the technology we possess other countries are definately not even close to being our equals...MILITARILY.
Use satellite imagery? Joe government looks on this forum and has a feeling that you are crossing a line. Guess who the camera is zoomed in on!
Bottom line is there is no easy answer to this situation. No enemy you can see or touch. No pinpoint position to attack. Yesterday at the G8 government heads from all the industrialized countries: U.S., Britan, France, Russia, China all stood together and denounced the actions. Iran, Syria, Palestine, Hezbolla, Hamas denounced the actions. Where do we start to look? How? I really believe our leaders throughout the world are looking at it in the same fassion. How do we get the terrorists while not pissing off the populous?
because they see the governments using these terrorist attacks to get through provisions that otherwise people wouldn't want...and that people are overwhelmingly against.
but people are starting to realize that...and the effects the governments want from these 'terrorist' attacks is going to stop working.