More death is not the answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bong30
Thanks BG.... your great
Do i have to take name calling from you.....
I was trying.....im done
If you'll read back, Bong, you'll see that I didn't call you a name. I was simply repeating what LuckyNine had said. I don't much care about how literate you are, anyway. If I cared about that with members here, well, I'd be in for fairly steady disappointment. I do care that you get so heated at times that you lose your cool. You have valid arguments, and someday you're going to get to the point where you see that the calmer and cooler you stay as you're making them, the more converts you'll win. Also, the more respect. This is why, among many reasons, it's so troubling for people to listen to Michael Savage. He's a slavering, screaming, emo madman, and until he learns how to keep the crazy-angry-factor in check, no rational, reasonable people can take him seriously.
Truly, no offense intended to you, my friend. I mean that from the bottom of my heart. And I think you know that.
More death is not the answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by birdgirl73
If you'll read back, Bong, you'll see that I didn't call you a name. I was simply repeating what LuckyNine had said. I don't much care about how literate you are, anyway. If I cared about that with members here, well, I'd be in for fairly steady disappointment. I do care that you get so heated at times that you lose your cool. You have valid arguments, and someday you're going to get to the point where you see that the calmer and cooler you stay as you're making them, the more converts you'll win. Also, the more respect. This is why, among many reasons, it's so troubling for people to listen to Michael Savage. He's a slavering, screaming, emo madman, and until he learns how to keep the crazy-angry-factor in check, no rational, reasonable people can take him seriously.
Truly, no offense intended to you, my friend. I mean that from the bottom of my heart. And I think you know that.
I dont know that..... take all the shots at me you want.....
More death is not the answer.
I'm not going to take shots at you, Bong, and I didn't mean to with my repetition of that word earlier. If that hurt you, I regret it and apologize. You can deny this if you want to, but I do think that, deep down, you know it's important to me to be courteous and civil to folks. Heck, you even know the reasons why better than most. (The life-is-frighteningly-short-we-might-as-well-be-nice lesson I learned in early November when I lost my sister.)
You can choose to be hurt and offended by my repeating that word, or you can choose to see that that repetition wasn't intended maliciously. In the end, I suspect my record of taking the high road will still reflect pretty darn well in comparison to some others I can think of . . . . And if you do choose the hurt-offended route, that'll reveal a lot more about yourself than you might realize.
Love and light to you, Bong. From one of the smartest liberals you'll ever encounter. (And one of the most tolerant, too.)
More death is not the answer.
I allways thought of you as a Level headed democrat.
Im just illiterate.........
if you want to call your self a dumb Lib go ahead, and hang out with Mickey Moore and your girl Cindy sheehan......great company.
Im done BG... you take your shots ill take mine
that wasnt the first time BTW....
More death is not the answer.
I'm not going to take shots, Bong. That's my point. And if you choose to take the low road in response to me, you'll want to think again about that.
Actually, I am a level-headed Democrat. You are the one who combines "dumb" with "lib."
More death is not the answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bong30
what do you think the clinton years were ike for me..... I just waited him out.
I did not have sexual realations with that women.........LOL
He was the best republican (yes he makes gdub look liberal) president since reagan.
I personally do not like the Clintons because of their involvement in arms deals...I don't trust either of them but I would take a Clinton over a Bush any day. There have always been presidents involved in sex in the White House you live in a fantasy land if you think any different. This was one of the first times it has been brought to light.
I personally am not that prudish....
More death is not the answer.
Just think if Hilary (she wont) won
This is our presidents for the last how ever long....
Bush
bush
clinton
clinton
bush
bush
clinton
Does anyone see anything wrong with that.?
More death is not the answer.
Yeah, that is pretty perverse now that I see it listed that way. Good eye-opener!
I'd definitely like another name than Clinton on the end there. Hillary can't win anway. She might get a nomination, but she'll lose it for our team if she does. Too much deep hate and mistrust of her. That's why we need Obama and Edwards to really step up to the plate and join together, I think.
More death is not the answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by birdgirl73
Yeah, that is pretty perverse now that I see it listed that way. Good eye-opener!
I'd definitely like another name than Clinton on the end there. Hillary can't win anway. She might get a nomination, but she'll lose it for our team if she does. Too much deep hate and mistrust of her. That's why we need Obama and Edwards to really step up to the plate and join together, I think.
YES!!! I agree!:D :D
More death is not the answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bong30
Just think if Hilary (she wont) won
This is our presidents for the last how ever long....
Bush
bush
clinton
clinton
bush
bush
clinton
Does anyone see anything wrong with that.?
Definately! Clinton is used to being surrounded by bush. Having a Clinton without a bush on both sides just don't seem right.:D
Have a good one!:jointsmile:
