Draft U.S. Paper Allows Commanders To Seek Pre-emptive Nuclear Strikes(N.Korea/Iran)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amsterdam

did pisshead quote 1984?can anyone say jackass?get a real argument instead of refering to science fiction NOVELS

---

You can't miss the cameras monitoring every move.
The media censorship and manipulation.
The demands for ever tighter restrictions imposed on the general public.
The hysteria is the result of spin and bullshit but the results are the same , just an excuse to gain more power and more control.
These were science fiction but like a lot of sci- fi it has become reality.

Just because you dismiss something as sci - fi doesn't mean anything , try reading Jules Verne or how about the idea of sattelites (first put forward by a sci - fi writer) or maybe you would prefer the writings of these sites :
http://spaces.msn.com/members/zaphodsheads/Blog/cns!1pSxr6XsAtAaQgOgn4BQNx-Q!194.entry
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/l...nd-warrior.htm The technology described here isn't fiction but it started out that way , so how funny is sci-fi now??

yeah, this is 2005, it's not 1960 anymore, technology has radically taken over our daily lives (and it could be used for good, and is going to increasingly be used for monitoring and surveillance and tracking and taxing and following...drones will be taking over our air defense and military...

and we'll have robot police walking around and people will still call it freedom.

if anyone knows about the inventor tesla...his ideas could revolutionize the way we live, and this was decades ago...but those in power who use the fascism and the socialism to control people choose not to use it, but to suppress it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by psychocat

I believe what they hate amog other things is the hypocrisy of the US , the meglomaniacal leaders who believe the US has any right to tell others how they should run their countries and of course the arrogance that makes them believe they are better than others.
The US is notoriously paranoid , they always seem to seek out enemies where none existed.

---

that is a stupid point.stupid.japan,al queda.we didnt seek them out.did you even go to school?jesus christ that is funny. :D

Yes, Pisshead, I am calling lord Bush a liar, in fact I don't even like him. however, i do support the war b/c it ousted a brutal dictator... if bush has to lie to America to make us do what right, then more power to him. I wish Clinton would have lied to get troops into Rwanda... maybe 800,000 people wouldn't have been slaughtered by machetes...

Bye the way, no-on e still has answered my question: what criteria would all you liberals use to decide which countries can have WMD's that dont already?

Once again I state that no-one will be able to answer this.

well, i'm not a liberal, so i dont qualify to answer.

Answer it anyway. No bullshit, no links to random sites, no saying "no-one should have nukes" just list, if you could make that coice, what criteria would you use.

Haha, just asI thought, no one on this board has any real answers, only complaints. I bet the only ones who could answer such a simple question are me, Amsterdam, Torog, and Yocass. All you liberals and conspiracy-theorists have shown your stupidity once again.

(prove me wrong by giving a freakin' answer)

i think only countries whose names include united states of america or isreal should have them. if you have dark skin and speak arabic, maybe you shouldn't be able to have them?

is this a trick question? do you have the real answer?

so when do we start the invasions of all those other countries that have them? we gots us lots of liberatin' to do!

Im not a liberal either but im going to answer your dumb ass question, with a statement instead of a list.

By the geneva convention no WMD's are suppossed to be produced. This was put in place to specifically control their production and use.(thats a good thing)

So.... by his agreement countries that dont already have them are subject to invasion for accuiring them.

SO... the subject sort of dies off after you say that.

There is no criteria, there never will be a criteria, because the UN and US wont allow it. It would be a total waste of time to write a list of would be criteria to a dead subject.

anmd not to mention I was never a part of this conversation.... I am the one who never read Orwell.

Hydrizzle, your insistance that people should answer your question, and then insulting them for not bothering to do so, just makes you look imature. You're not winning the argument by a long shot - give it up.