36 hour dilution worked for the chronic

36 hour dilution worked for the chronic

Let me just start by saying that I've been stoned for the past decade. I'm not proud of that, in fact I worry about lung cancer and enfazeema (how ever you spell that) a lot. Anyhow, what I'm saying is that if a daily smoker like me can pass a drug screens by dilution, anybody can.

I smoked on Thursday night, just like I always do. Friday morning I had a job interview, so I didn't smoke. At the interview they asked me to take a drug screen, which I did on Saturday morning. This would be 36 hours since the last time I smoked. On Saturday morning I got up 4 hours before my test. I had my usual coffee and mufin. I then drank all the water I could stand. With each glass I took a multivitim containing a couple B vitimins. I probably drank a half gallon of water and and took 8 vitimins. After I made sure my pee was yellow, I popped four aspirin and grabbed another cup of coffee for the road. I passed. I am 30 years old, 6' - 200lbs, minor luv handles and belly. I also passed a drug screen 8 years ago kind of the same way, after smoking bongs the night before. Back then I just drank a ton of water and had some spaghetti 45 minutes before the test to turn my pee yellow.

Drug screens are a cinch, as long as you have some warning. I was talking to a friend in HR who says they cost the employer $100. It's kind of sad, because the only people who can get busted are pot-heads. Coke and mainline drugs leave the system so fast that with a couple days notice hard drug users can pass easier than someone who smokes pot. Most pot smokers can find out how to pass by asking friends or searching the internet. It's a racket by the people who do the tests, and they don't accomplish anything. The only way to ensure a drug-free work place is to do what the military does, random drug tests with a strip search. Drug screens are a symbolic hoax, as well as unconstitutional, unethical and illegal, but hey, all is fair in love and war, and the US is attacking us smokers with our own tax dollars. I love America, but sometime I get discouraged.

I would also like to say that I read a lot of posts about how dilution never works that made me worry. It is my theory that these posts are put up by poeple who sell fake pee and additives, in an attempt to sell fear. If you have a drug SCREEN (as apposed to a "test") don't sweat it. Just do dilution if you have some notice. It has worked for me four times now.

Good luck with your drug screen! And, please help me convince non-smokers that they would be better off if the resources wasted in the "war on drugs" where to be re-directed from building jails and convicting thugs to educating children and helping addicts recover.

joker, good post. I haven't been as active on this board the past couple of week as I would have liked, but I haven't seen the "... posts about how dilution never works ..." you refer to. There are 2 dilution guideline post, mine and S2's, stickied to the top of the main board and while I must say that I personally feel you were 'lucky' to pass with just 36 hours clean, I do believe you and that dilution is a viable weapon in this insane drug war. There are, as I see it, 2 drawbacks to dilution. 1 is that if you are a daily user, it is very common to have cannibiloid counts that are so high that they can not be diluted down to under the testing cutoff levels. Let me also inject here that a drug 'screen' (EMIT) cutoff level of 50ng/ml, that is screening out all 31 cannabis metabolites is roughly equall to a drug 'test' (GC/MS) cutoff level of 15ng/ml for the single cannabis metabolite THCA/THC-COOH. 2nd is the problem with a 'dilute' result for the urine validity check. As per DOT testing regulations, "As a laboratory you must consider the primary specimen to be dilute if the creatinine concentration is less than 20 mg/dL and the specific gravity is less than 1.003,...". (http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rulesregs/fmcsr/regs/40.htm) Statisticly, according to the US gov study on water loading, "A high percentage of participants -- 75% of all participants -- were able to produce at least one low or 'dilute' specimen during the testing process", and over all "113 out of 500 specimens (22.6%) made it into the dilute range...".(http://www.dot.gov/ost/dapc/main/waterloading.pdf)
Given these facts, myself and others on this board 'recomend' substitution as the primary way to pass any non observed drug test. Simply because with substituting a clean sample, you will pass without any concern about when you last used or what your creatinine and specific gravity levels are.
Again, dilution works and works well, but not as well as substitution. Plain and simple. N2

As my time to edit , 5 minutes, ran out, I must appoligize and correct my prior post. I confused this board with a similar one at http://cheaptalk.marijuana.com/420/f...?s=&forumid=24, where indeed there are 2 post on dilution stickied to the main board. The dilution guidelines I wrote are indeed also posted on this board and are linked to in my 'signature' under each post I submit. Please excuse my confusion. N2