Results 1 to 3 of 3
Threaded View
-
06-12-2004, 02:44 PM #1OPJunior Member
36 hour dilution worked for the chronic
36 hour dilution worked for the chronic
Let me just start by saying that I've been stoned for the past decade. I'm not proud of that, in fact I worry about lung cancer and enfazeema (how ever you spell that) a lot. Anyhow, what I'm saying is that if a daily smoker like me can pass a drug screens by dilution, anybody can.
I smoked on Thursday night, just like I always do. Friday morning I had a job interview, so I didn't smoke. At the interview they asked me to take a drug screen, which I did on Saturday morning. This would be 36 hours since the last time I smoked. On Saturday morning I got up 4 hours before my test. I had my usual coffee and mufin. I then drank all the water I could stand. With each glass I took a multivitim containing a couple B vitimins. I probably drank a half gallon of water and and took 8 vitimins. After I made sure my pee was yellow, I popped four aspirin and grabbed another cup of coffee for the road. I passed. I am 30 years old, 6' - 200lbs, minor luv handles and belly. I also passed a drug screen 8 years ago kind of the same way, after smoking bongs the night before. Back then I just drank a ton of water and had some spaghetti 45 minutes before the test to turn my pee yellow.
Drug screens are a cinch, as long as you have some warning. I was talking to a friend in HR who says they cost the employer $100. It's kind of sad, because the only people who can get busted are pot-heads. Coke and mainline drugs leave the system so fast that with a couple days notice hard drug users can pass easier than someone who smokes pot. Most pot smokers can find out how to pass by asking friends or searching the internet. It's a racket by the people who do the tests, and they don't accomplish anything. The only way to ensure a drug-free work place is to do what the military does, random drug tests with a strip search. Drug screens are a symbolic hoax, as well as unconstitutional, unethical and illegal, but hey, all is fair in love and war, and the US is attacking us smokers with our own tax dollars. I love America, but sometime I get discouraged.
I would also like to say that I read a lot of posts about how dilution never works that made me worry. It is my theory that these posts are put up by poeple who sell fake pee and additives, in an attempt to sell fear. If you have a drug SCREEN (as apposed to a "test") don't sweat it. Just do dilution if you have some notice. It has worked for me four times now.
Good luck with your drug screen! And, please help me convince non-smokers that they would be better off if the resources wasted in the "war on drugs" where to be re-directed from building jails and convicting thugs to educating children and helping addicts recover.thejoker Reviewed by thejoker on . 36 hour dilution worked for the chronic 36 hour dilution worked for the chronic Let me just start by saying that I've been stoned for the past decade. I'm not proud of that, in fact I worry about lung cancer and enfazeema (how ever you spell that) a lot. Anyhow, what I'm saying is that if a daily smoker like me can pass a drug screens by dilution, anybody can. I smoked on Thursday night, just like I always do. Friday morning I had a job interview, so I didn't smoke. At the interview they asked me to take a drug screen, Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Chronic User, 2 weeks abstained, Can dilution work?
By wantcleanpeepee in forum Drug TestingReplies: 7Last Post: 06-24-2013, 03:50 AM -
Does dilution work even for chronic weed smokers?
By GAMESHARQ in forum Drug TestingReplies: 3Last Post: 06-29-2009, 11:21 AM -
20 hour day? 10 hour day/10 hour night?
By medicinegivers in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 4Last Post: 01-26-2008, 08:00 PM -
The dilution method worked for me! Hear my story!
By fu2much in forum Drug TestingReplies: 4Last Post: 01-08-2008, 11:34 PM -
13 hour nights/11 hour days
By StudentGrower in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 6Last Post: 10-02-2007, 10:53 PM