Quote Originally Posted by VisionaryUrbanTactic
i think it was john bonham that wrote it.

point is, you can tell that the guy is right, and the government guy is strecthing the truth a bit much, dont you think?

will knowing who wrote the rebuttal make it suck any less for your side?

not really.

any person with common sense can read that nova story, and see homie is telling tall tales.

lets stop beating around the bush, is the guy telling the truth?
Well for starters I hold no Ph.D, So I do not call myself an expert in any field. However I will believe a story more if the author has the credentials to back up his area of experience. Kinda like a lawyer telling me how to preform spinal surgery. To someone with no proper training on the subject you can't go on the fact of "Hey it shouldn't look like that", who made you an expert to make such a claim going only on what you think it should have looked like?

Once people where told thunder came from god/gods being pissed off, just for the fact people couldn't comprehend science or had little to no knowledge of it. Now we know the science behind thunder and even teach it to elementary school kids. So today when you hear thunder you know why it happens and are not down on your knees praying for forgiveness to whatever your god maybe every time it happens.

Now a building is downed in ways they never where before and people are screaming more or less "god was pissed off" without knowing any of the science behind it. After 9/11 it seems quite allot of people are now considering themselves "experts" in how a building should react when they themselves just don't have the slightest training in the field.