Quote Originally Posted by dusto2k3
It's a coinsidence. They would have to get a warrant to tap a dealers phone, unless they could connect him with terrorism, then, they wouldn't need a warrant. So, if they really did tap his phone, or intercept the signal, then its for other reasons (not cricket)and they could have done it if the guy has any of the cell services.
Yea, that's what I'm thinking, if this guy had a huge operation taking place, the government got a warrant to tap (Or didn't, seeing as how they don't feel the need to respect our rights (don't talk bong30) and just tapped warrantless) and they found out due to that. That could happen on any network. The moral here is, don't run huge drug operations.