Bare with me, maybe your not understanding what I am saying.

com·men·tar·y [ kómmən tèrree ]
noun (plural com·men·tar·ies)
Definition:
1. series of explanatory notes: a series of notes explaining or interpreting a written text
2. explanatory essay: an essay or book that explains a text
3. clarification of situation: an example illustrating a situation

fact [ fakt ] (plural facts)
noun
Definition:
1. something known to be true: something that can be shown to be true, to exist, or to have happened
2. truth or reality of something: the truth or actual existence of something, as opposed to the supposition of something or a belief about something

fic·tion [ f*ksh'n ] (plural fic·tions)
noun
Definition:
1. literary works of imagination: novels and stories that describe imaginary people and events
2. work of fiction: a novel, story, or other work of fiction
3. untrue statement: something that is untrue and has been made up to deceive people

the·o·ry [ th əree, three ] (plural the·o·ries)
noun
Definition:
1. rules and techniques: the body of rules, ideas, principles, and techniques that applies to a subject, especially when seen as distinct from actual practice
2. speculation: abstract thought or contemplation
3. idea formed by speculation: an idea of or belief about something arrived at through speculation or conjecture
4. hypothetical circumstances: a set of circumstances or principles that is hypothetical
5. scientific principle to explain phenomena: a set of facts, propositions, or principles analyzed in their relation to one another and used, especially in science, to explain phenomena


Ok now we got some deffinetions out of the way..


What a surprise a website not good enuff for you.....Im sorry did you want CNN or Fox...what if i had one from CBS or MSNBC what would you do...Hey soo they talked about it, sooo what huh.Our government loves us to death..
I don't care if it comes from CNN, Fox, Prisonplanet. As long as it states the facts and can backup its claims with evidence. You wouldn't want to be convicted in court based solely on theoretical evidence? What you and the others who follow this cult is just that. You expect us to convict our government based only on stuff that you yourself couldn't be tried on in court. One problem with people like Mr.AJ is that his stories are based on commentary, his perception of the truth. Just like Catholics and Christians both follow the bible, each has there own interpretations of it. This allows Mr.AJ to selectively pick between truth and fiction to make up a theory. And its not just limited to him... Bill O'rielly, Anderson Cooper, Glenn Beck are all guilty of it too.. There news is based off there believes on how something went down. Commentary = no real accountability, and thats all these stories are. Its almost like whispering in a person ear who has depression to "cut yourself". Thoughts are planted in peoples heads with very little or no evidence to real facts only opinions and opinions of opinions.

It is rare that any one story will post the truth on anything. However when you make claims that our government is plotting against its own people thats some serious claim you got there. You better be stating facts, not commentary. Most of us could care less how one person thinks it happened.

When you talk about CIA operations that are now declassified your best bet is to post the real deal hard facts. Why? Because anyone with a brain should not take such claims at there word. Go look up the actual declassified reports and READ them.. You like to bring up that they where gonna shoot down aircraft, but what you always leave out is that the aircraft was to be a drone. And 9/11 conspiracies have been debunked over and over with actual facts. Yet you choose not to pay any attention to them because it goes against your beliefs/religion.. Its not only been done by the government but also by many independent investigations, and you always come up with the same story to refute a cross examination regardless.


Some food for thought:

If fire can't melt or warp steel due to heat, then why is metal fireproofed?

You assume that the term "Pull it" means demo a building because you are told it does.. But how many demo people to you actually know and have asked? I've done some work for a company in New England that is into demolition, I know this answer, do you?

Why are there allot of anonymous sources in conspiracy stories?

Out of all the people who saw flight 77 fly by and hit the pentagon, why do theorist always choose to quote the guy that was 2+ miles away? Or the one with his back turned?