Quote Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Hey, I got a better idea yet!!! When a member has 11 banned user names already they just keep a low profile.......

See ya:thumbsup:

Have a good one!:jointsmile:
Please don't take this as an insult P4B, but what exactly do y'all look for when approving new members? I thought the reason new memberships had to be approved was because someone had to review the IP adress and stuff to make sure it wasn't a banned user. Granted, I'm pretty ignorant on this subject, but it just seems like there are a lot of people with multible accounts, or simply banned members finding their way back here.

Or do y'all just give some people a second chance with a new name?

I don't know, it just seems kind of pointless that members have to be reviewed before they are allowed to sign in.

If you don't mind me asking... how many accounts do the mods deny in an average a week?
JaggedEdge Reviewed by JaggedEdge on . New idea for moderation. How about instead of a moderator system which has numorous flaws including the fact the the moderator can be motivated by personal opinion or prejudice we enact a program similar to the ones i see all over the other message posting sites. LET THE USERS DECIDE. Its kinda like the reputation system on if a post has several (say more than 5) negative marks on it by other members then it will be hidden or deleted or brought to the attention of moderators who's job will be to take posts that Rating: 5