How about instead of a moderator system which has numorous flaws including the fact the the moderator can be motivated by personal opinion or prejudice we enact a program similar to the ones i see all over the other message posting sites.

LET THE USERS DECIDE.

Its kinda like the reputation system on if a post has several (say more than 5) negative marks on it by other members then it will be hidden or deleted or brought to the attention of moderators who's job will be to take posts that have been voted on and if enough negative votes are recorded they will remove it or move it.

Say someone makes a post that isn't supposed to be in this particular forum, they could give it a negative mark and leave a comment so the mod knows where to move it instead of delete it or whatever.

That way everyone can have a say on what we want or dont want in our forum without being afraid of crossing a mod on a personal opinion. Which has happened to just about all of us at one point or another. That way we don't have fiasco's like with LIP which im sure is well known.

This seems to the fairest option to choose and im sure the existing reputation system could be altered to do this exact thing.
SwirlyMass Reviewed by SwirlyMass on . New idea for moderation. How about instead of a moderator system which has numorous flaws including the fact the the moderator can be motivated by personal opinion or prejudice we enact a program similar to the ones i see all over the other message posting sites. LET THE USERS DECIDE. Its kinda like the reputation system on if a post has several (say more than 5) negative marks on it by other members then it will be hidden or deleted or brought to the attention of moderators who's job will be to take posts that Rating: 5