Quote Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Sorry Oneironaut.......I deleted off that b.s. rant once already that you quoted.

Have a good one!:jointsmile:
Oh all right, good.

I'll make my other point again then.

These people did do something very irresponsible and they should probably be punished for it, but it's not the worst thing in the world. Every day lots of parents give their babies alcohol to get them to stop crying, but how often do you hear about that in the media? Never, because people don't care about alcohol. It wouldn't make it off the cutting room floor, even though alcohol is probably a lot worse for a baby than a little weed smoke.

My parents occasionally smoked weed around me when I was a baby, and presumably I got a contact buzz sometimes, but I grew up just fine. It's not going to kill the kid and shouldn't cause any major damage if it's not overdone, but still it's stupid to give a two- or five-year-old any kind of intoxicating drug.

But this brings up an interesting question. At what age does it cross that fuzzy boundary between an absolutely irresponsible act and a somewhat questionable act? And when does it turn from a somewhat questionable act into a fully acceptable act?