I know how many people like Wikipedia on here...

[memoryburner]

Thats the stupidest idea ever. A wikipedia for christians because the real wikipedia is "un-christian" and "un-american" yeah...we will see how far this website gets. I tried to create an account so i could make some articles...but its like IMPOSSIBLE to create one.

[Snorbel]

ROFL

This is just...ridiculous.

I can't stand people who get offended.

Also, is it just me, or is it RIDICULOUSLY ridiculous that they stole the wiki layout?

Well, they didn't exactly steal it, because that's the generic layout for MediaWiki, probably the most common wiki engine out there. :thumbsup:

[PatrickHenry]

Wiki to me, is left leaning to say the least, but i like to use it when in Political debate..... like slaying someone with there own sowrd...Cool

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

The truth hurts beeotch! LMAO

[Bob the Awesome]

Good for them! If it makes the conservative pigs happy, let em! If they find joy in they're conservatism and Christian roots theology, who are you to argue? Weed makes you happy in much the same way, and how would you feel when you see people make fun of what we do on this site? Just cause you don't agree is no reason to sink their boat! Not meaning to be a dick, it's just that this sort of thinking kinda pisses me off. vvvvv

Actually, the problem I have with this site isn't their own opinions, it's:

1) They contradict themselves. They say Wikipedia is biased, and has a very anglophiliac-based outlook, but goes on to say Conservapedia fixes this by... having an American and Christian basis for writing things? Not agreeing is minor, these people butchered logic and left it for dead upon a large spike.

2) It's going against Wikipedia, and you know how much many of us love our Wikipedia

[sam44]

Anyone know how to create an account? You have to log in to edit pages, and there appears to be no way to sign up for an account. Probably their way of controlling the information that reaches people. This site is 10x more biased then Wikipedia. Omg.

[JaggedEdge]

American Civil War - Conservapedia

Look at what it has to say about the Civil War. It sounds like it was written by a child.

The war wasn't even really about slavery and they fail to even mention the entire war was unconstitutional. Wikepidea may not point this out either, but at least their info on it is more than a parapraph... What kind of information is that. The site is useless...

[Bob the Awesome]

Wow, that civil war article is bad... actually, most of the articles on here are poorly made, and have uncited statements everywhere despite the demands on the site's commandments... sad.

And yea, seems to be no way to register, just to log in. I guess they don't want us coming in and injecting our 'bias' (AKA intelligent ideas) into the site... oh well.

[SwirlyMass]

Isn't it funny how people will label something liberal simply because it isn't steadfast to their beliefs.

[PatrickHenry]

American Civil War - Conservapedia

Look at what it has to say about the Civil War. It sounds like it was written by a child.

The war wasn't even really about slavery and they fail to even mention the entire war was unconstitutional. Wikepidea may not point this out either, but at least their info on it is more than a parapraph... What kind of information is that. The site is useless...

I'm not defending Conservapedia, and I agree the article is waaay too breif, but the Civil War WAS really about slavery. There were other issues, but slavery was the key to the whole war clear and simple. If you think our country is polarized now, you should read about the sharp division between north and south because of slavery (prior to the war itself).

[rebgirl420]

Some of these republicans make me ashamed of being republican. With all of their crazy religious morality issues. I just hope that everyone knows that there are different kinds of republicans. Ones that are bible thumpers and ones like me who smoke pot and aren't religious.