Quote Originally Posted by robert42
problem with that is people might use them for spam/adverting or they may use large/animated images in signatures thus using allota bandwidth and slowing down the site
strange that i used to go to a site with a hell of a lot more members than this place, all of whom used image/banner sigs, alot of which would actually be animated... much like one of my own
http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...botage-sig.gif

add to this that this site was also connected to a game server, allowing members to browse who was playing at that time.... i say its strange cuz that site was actually alot faster than this site, with or without the likes of firefox.

i don't know much about sites and bandwidth, but surely a site like this could afford a better bandwidth.

and you can put restrictions on the sizes and content of banner sigs.


if this were to go to a vote then i would vote yes to banner sigs, but then again.... does my opinion really count?
Wesley Pipes Reviewed by Wesley Pipes on . No theme? Got sigs? No themes? Then how about image allowed sigs? That would be a nice touch too, and show individuals creativity. Rating: 5