Quote Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
You have not provided one original thought to this topic - you claim to have extraordinary knowledge of this subject, but you have yet to show anything that demonstrates it. Is this because nobody here is qualified to understand your reasoning? I don't even know what to "confront" about what you say. The parts you wrote about building Seven are not new.

The part about the Jews isn't clear, either. If you've got something to say, why not just say it?

I think it's becoming very clear what we're dealing with here. Stay tuned. :thumbsup:
oh i have nothing to say about the jew causing it. i said that because a significant number of new Yorkers believe the jews planned it. They are wrong.

The reason i said that is because you keep citing the opinions of new yorkers to be of some value or significance when it is not.

It doesnâ??t matter if anyone in new york believes the government had involvement or not.

That is what Iâ??m saying.

I havenâ??t brought up any new information because we arenâ??t talking about the specific events. Would you like to talk about one of the specific events?

How about the pentagonâ?¦
The official story is that the plane hit the building and vaporized.
This is impossible

For several reasons
1) jet fuel doesnâ??t burn not enough
2) the amount of jet fuel in the plane did not contain enough energy to vaporize that much metal
3) if the plane vaporized the metal wouldnâ??t disappear. It would be a vapor while under the hot conditions then would precipitate out of the air once cooled. It would cool only a few feed away. Yet there are no â??puddlesâ?ť of metal. Were did it go?
4) it is impossible for an uncontrolled fire to vaporize metal because it has too much surface area exposed to the cold air and couldnâ??t get hot enough

If you would like to have a civil conversation donâ??t change the topic, speak to the points I just mentioned

With love