Quote Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
How do you know? From a Zogby poll? Forget that, it's not correct, their 9/11 polls are biased and not objective. In addition, I know a LOT of New Yorkers, and nobody has ever expressed to me the idea that the government was involved in the attacks of 9/11.

The argument here usually goes back to Larry Silverstein, as if he could somehow get away with ordering the destruction of 7 WTC and collecting hundreds of millions,or more, in insurance. One film clip, from some far-off TV station, in Wisconsin I believe, was so off-based about the condition of NYC's financial district and the WTC prior to 9/11 it wasn't even worth addressing.
IT comes down to a very few facts:
-tower 7 was not hit by a plane
-tower 7 fell, and looked as if imploded
-tower 7 was on fire
-Fire has Never been the cause of a cement/steel construction building
-it is impossible for the building to have fallen because of fire

-How did the building fall?

-well since it looked as if imploded, implosion is a very valid explanation
-unfortunately it takes weeks to plan and arrange the explosives to implode a building
-So either the building fell for no reason; unlikely
-or the demolition was planned ahead, a chilling thought

And oddly enough this entire problem was just skipped over in the commissioners report

You know, the report that was ā??intendedā? to be the most comprehensive explanation and description of the event.