Quote Originally Posted by Torog
Howdy BA,

Catholics don't believe in the death penalty or abortion,nothing surprising there. As for a rape victim bearing the child of her rapist,she should,if possible,because the child is innocent and if she doesn't want to raise the child,she should allow adoption of the child,not murder the child,for the sins and crimes of it's father. O'Reilly's thinking ain't sick,he understands that the rapist should be be forever kept from harming another child,ever again..why do you think that protecting children from such scum,is sick thinking ? Why do you rush to murder an innocent child,for the sins and crimes of it's father ?

Yer just looking for any excuse to bash O'Reilly and by doing so,you attempt to deviate away from the topic of the thread..i find that kind of thinking and tactic,to be sick.

Have a good one ...
I guess it's too much to expect O'Reilly, the priests, pope, etc., to understand that forcing a woman to go through nine months of pregnancy, after being brutally raped, probably beaten, etc., and bearing the child of this mentally diseased subhuman, is just completely wrong. If they don't understand that, they're missing some major elements of humanity.

Kill the rapist, for sure. The parasitic fetus that was forced into an unwilling host, by violence, has no "rights". Don't give me this crap about "protecting children" - this is a clear case of religious insanity that is as bad as anything in the Koran, Bible, or other theistic texts.

I don't look for "any excuse to bash" O'Reilly. He provides them every single day. The rape VICTIMS deserve protection from mental midgets like him.

P.S. I do not agree that a fetus is a "child", innocent or otherwise - and this thing should not be legally protected from being scooped out of a rape victim's body and flushed down the toilet, into the sewers, where it belongs.