Quote Originally Posted by Scarlet Sky
a 400w would be the cat's ass in that space. as far as co2, yeast and sugar babe works like a charm
Hi(gh?)!

Yeah, I've considered something like that. However, I have heard very mixed things about such homemade solutions. While I don't have any doubt that they're not effective for large growing areas, I'm still undecided about their use in small areas.

So you say this works well for you? I guess my only question would be if you have experience under similar (or the same) growing conditions, but without the home-brewed C02? I ask, because what the "con" side generally says, is that people end up crediting their home-brew C02 systems (which they say don't really produce much C02 at all) for something it didn't really do. Something to compare it to would either support or challenge that assertion.

If it does work, however, I would definately take advantage of it, if playing with the venting would not involve too big (or elaborate) a set-up. Obviously if using C02 would get me more bud in the same space, I'd be interested - since it would mean I could just use less space (since I'm really only growing for myself and "the missuss", and the odd "session" I host.)
sharer6969 Reviewed by sharer6969 on . Lumens and number of lights For a fairly small grow cab situation (no bigger floor area than 2' x 3', or possibly 2.5' x 2.5'), I was debating which would be the best use of light, considering... - I don't want a lot of noise - I want to use as little power as possible - I have no immediate plans for C02 enrichment. As such, I'd like the lights to give adequate light per square foot, but not generate unnecessary heat (necessitating further climate control measures, hence more noise and more power consumption.) Rating: 5