Results 21 to 30 of 35
-
02-21-2007, 02:45 PM #21
OPSenior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
Should we stop putting criminals and killers on trial because we don't have the time or it would stir up too much mud?
Originally Posted by Purple Banana
These people are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands ...... why is it okay for war criminals to go free?:wtf:
:noel:
-
02-21-2007, 03:35 PM #22
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
Look a left wing circle jerk......
-
02-21-2007, 04:16 PM #23
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
choosing scapegoats and laying blame will never solve the underlying problems. these fools are merely figureheads for a political machine and, as such, are expendable anyway. the present executive agenda is only a manifestation of the ultimate goals of that machine. we pay far too much attention to the circus and not enough to the road we travel.
Originally Posted by GrowRebel
-
02-21-2007, 04:17 PM #24
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
Howdy Bong ,
Originally Posted by Bong30
I wonder..is a circle jerk better than a cluster-f*ck ?
Thanx for continueing to fight for what's right ! Sorry I ain't been here to help ya more !
Have a good one ! :jointsmile:
-
02-21-2007, 04:33 PM #25
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
I find this to be a joke. Impeachment for what? Making Katrina? Invading Iraq? Didn't the dems sit on the House Floor all full of applause and support BEFORE the war became unpopular?
Clinton went through impeachment proceedings through the house and it was defeated in Senate. The charges were perjury and obstruction of justice.....NOW we're looking at MAYBE electing his wife!
WHY should we waste the time and money? BECAUSE it gives alot of face time before 2008! Just another good example of government waste and egos at work.
Have a good one!:s4:
-
02-21-2007, 04:47 PM #26
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
Why should men and women have to die in Iraq? It was a war started with shitty made up intel. As president he is personally responsible for the actions of America and the death of our troops. While the timing might not be the best to stop anything right now, it will show future president that if you plan to goto war and end lives, both friend and foe, you better damn well be sure your information is accurate. Clinton might have lied, but no one died from his lie.
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
-
02-21-2007, 05:36 PM #27
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
ASTANA, Kazakhstan ?? Russia gave the Bush administration intelligence after the September 11 attacks that suggested Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq was preparing attacks in the United States, President Vladimir Putin (search) said Friday.
Putin said he couldn't comment on how critical the Russians' information was in the U.S. decision to invade Iraq.
In Washington, a U.S. official said Putin's information did not add to what the United States already knew about Saddam's intentions.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, said the Russian tip did not specify a time or a place where an attack might take place.
The Bush administration in part justified the invasion of Iraq by saying Saddam had links to terror groups, including Al Qaeda (search). The U.S. commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks said this week there was no evidence of any collaboration between Iraq and Usama bin Laden's terror network.
FOXNews.com - Putin: We Told U.S. Saddam Was Planning Attacks - U.S. & World
Nizar Nayuf (Nayyouf-Nayyuf), a Syrian journalist who recently defected from Syria to Western Europe and is known for bravely challenging the Syrian regime, said in a letter Monday, January 5, to Dutch newspaper ??De Telegraaf,? that he knows the three sites where Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) are kept.
IRAQ'S WEAPONS IN SYRIA: SENIOR SYRIAN JOURNALIST
Saddam's Secrets corroborates what Ariel Sharon said on Dec. 23, 2002, in a television appearance on Israel's Channel 2: "Chemical and biological weapons which Saddam is endeavoring to conceal have been moved from Iraq to Syria."
But Sada gave more detail to that claim. He said Hussein's Special Republican Guard brigades loaded WMDs onto two converted Iraqi Airways planes that made 56 flights to Syria. He also said they were accompanied by a ground convoy of trucks carrying similar materials.
The flights and convoy escaped international attention because they reportedly occurred at the same time that Iraq was sending relief to Syria for a dam collapse.
Ex-Iraqi general, noted U.S. Christian writer tell story of WMDs and serving Hussein - 1/30/06
CNN) -- The CIA has in its hands the critical parts of a key piece of Iraqi nuclear technology -- parts needed to develop a bomb program -- that were dug up in a back yard in Baghdad, CNN has learned.
The parts, with accompanying plans, were unearthed by Iraqi scientist Mahdi Obeidi who said he had hidden them under a rose bush in his garden 12 years ago under orders from Qusay Hussein and Saddam Hussein's then son-in-law, Hussein Kamel.
CNN Security Correspondent David Ensor reports that under United Nations sanctions in place in 1991, the concealment of such materials -- and failure to disclose their presence -- would have constituted violations of Security Council regulations.
But U.S. officials emphasized that this was not evidence Iraq had a nuclear weapon -- but it was evidence the Iraqis concealed plans to reconstitute their nuclear program as soon as the world was no longer looking.
CNN.com - Nuke program parts unearthed in Baghdad back yard - Jun. 27, 2003
Impeachment based on what???
Have a good one!:s4:
-
02-21-2007, 06:14 PM #28
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
I don't care if Putin told him anything. The fact is Bush went into Iraq with bad intelligence. He might have thought it to be correct at the time, but he was wrong. Think of it this way. Say I told you your sister was just raped by that man over there 5 minutes ago. You, without double checking go and kill that man. Your still guilty even though I made up the original story. Sure I might get in trouble too, but I'm not the one who acted hastily. Reports are coming out now that the CIA knew there info was fabricated but chose to stick with it to influence the Iraqi war.
If the WMD are in Syria why are not we in there getting them back? Why would the Bush administration not bring this up so the media stops pressing them on it? Its false. If it was true Bush would have jumped at the chance. Don't kid yourself.
Ok they found plans for bomb making under the ground. Two things stick out here. First is, It was buried for 12 years under a rose bush. Makes me think they forgot about it, wasn't that important, or is complete bullshit. Maybe all three? Second is the fact it was 12 years old.. Way outdated by todays means. Sure a bomb is a bomb, but even they have advancements to them. Again why wouldn't Bush make a fuss about this stuff. It would only make people see he was right. But no, not even Bush tries to sell us that.
-
02-21-2007, 07:57 PM #29
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
So do ya really think that pursueing this would make a difference? Hell, Iran is breaking U.N. resolutions on the nuclear issue and what do the Dems do? Propose a resolution stating that we can't take any action against them. They openly admit to this, they have a 11 million man suicide army but yet thats not enough.
I'm sure that the Clinton, Kerry, Pelosi camps would do everything in their power to protect Syria. After all, the U.S. is the "international pariah"....these other countries have rainbows shooting out their back sides. :wtf:
Have a good one!:s4:
-
02-21-2007, 08:13 PM #30
Senior Member
Let's talk the "I" word .....
Yes, it will set an example that we will not allow people to overstep there authority. Maybe teach a president that Americans are not idiots and we can smell the BS that comes from Washington. Our president is supposed to do our will, not his own. Democracy is a vote by majority, not a select few. The rest of your post is spin..
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
California??s Prop 19: A Word-for-Word Analysis
By boaz in forum ActivismReplies: 71Last Post: 10-16-2010, 03:38 AM -
New Word
By DreadConches in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 2Last Post: 11-14-2007, 05:05 AM -
The "C" Word and the "P" Word
By Breukelen advocaat in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 13Last Post: 08-10-2007, 12:40 AM -
one word
By cambam in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 9Last Post: 01-14-2007, 05:16 AM -
The "M" Word
By Purple Banana in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 33Last Post: 01-12-2007, 01:10 AM








Register To Reply
Staff Online