Quote Originally Posted by LIP
No, no relighting. It'd taste like shit lol.

The idea is to get the joint to ember when your not smoking it, but not so much that it makes smoke. Sounds stupid dont it? It's still on fire but no smoke? Well, belive it or not it IS possible, that way the joint doesnt go out and you dont waste any weed or smoke. That's why the "Joints waste weed" thing is a pile of shit as far as im concerned. It may not work every time, but i can get it to work 90% of the time, so it's something that can be done again and again.

Most of my joints are between 30 and 45 minutes, most of them closer to 45.

Some people think im lying.. some dont. The ones that do are just jealous because they cant do it, and the ones who belive me can do it too... so im not the only one!

And no, it's taking a puff almost constantly. Not every 2 seconds, but im not in the habbit of couting between puffs. I guess it could be condiered slighter faster than you'd smoke a cig.

The idea isnt to smoke it slow, it's to roll it so you can smoke it and let it burn slow.

Also my joints have the english version of a roach, the bit of card. I find that because it opens the end of the joint up you can pull ALOT more smoke through and get massive massive hits.

The trick is to now how tight to roll it without rolling it so tight it goes out or you cant pull anything through. That's why it's hard to exlain in picutes, but damnit, i'll try.
i think it has a lot to do with how much bud you put in them. 2g seems to be the amount ive noticed that you say are in your joints.

for me, .3-.7 tops in a joint, unless i feel like doin something crazy. any more than that and i put it in a blunt.
orange floyd Reviewed by orange floyd on . Easier to roll: joint or blunt? I've never rolled either but I'm trying to roll a blueberry juicy jay and I am about to kill someone. Rating: 5