Quote Originally Posted by Jake Martinez
Why can't we all just use proper adjectives for the quality of weed (it's not good at all, it's okay, it's good, it's really fucking good) instead of coming up with all these fucking confusing slang terms? Let me try to break it down for you anyway...

Bad weed
Schwagg (pronounced shwag)
Dirtweed
Brickweed
Mexi-weed
Ditchweed
Shitweed

Middle-quality bud
Mids
Regs
Just plain weed

High-quality bud
*Chronic and all iterations thereof (Kron, Chron, etc.)
*Dro
*Haze
Dank
Bomb/Killer/Sweet shit
*Skunk
Fire

*These terms can also apply to strains of weed. Here's what they are...

Chronic---Some strains have this in their name to denote that it's good shit, but the original word chronic came from a strain that was really potent a long time ago


Dro---This is short for hydroponic, which is a method of growing that -CAN- but not always produce high-quality weed.


Haze---Added to some types of bud that are high quality (Hawaiian, Purple, Dutch, etc.)

Skunk---Was originally its own strain that was revered for it's extremely potent smell
skunk, chronic, and haze are each strains of marijuana they are just what was made popular by music or by being very abundant in probably the late 1980's and 1990's and now everyone generalizes those strains as the quality of the bud.
MrDank Reviewed by MrDank on . Where in the quality range does 'chronic' fall? Basically, I hear people say "chronic" or "chron", but I don't know quite what quality they're talking about. I mean, I know there's mexican brick and then middies and high mids ($5/gram Ohio prices) Then there's KB, stuff that's green, maybe a seed or two in a quarter at most, and has a lot of noticeable crystals. And then there's your name brands, really awesome stuff that I can't ever find :( So where do you place chronic in this bud-heirarchy? Thanks in advance. Rating: 5