Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
11074 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family

    Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family
    Pro-war Clinton candidacy success would mean same mob bosses have ruled U.S. since 1980
    [align=left]Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
    Prison Planet
    Monday, January 22, 2007[/align]

    [align=left]Another Clinton in office would mean America being under the thiefdom of either a Bush or a Clinton for a total of at least 32 years, 36 if Hillary is re-elected (many now acknowledge that H.W. Bush pulled the strings as VP during the Reagan era), and they still say anyone can become President! What a pathetic joke![/align]

    [align=left]Hillary Clinton surprised few when she announced her intention to run for the 2008 presidency in New York on Sunday.[/align]

    [align=left]Forecasters are already predicting a success for the Senator, meaning Americans will probably be living under the same hierarchical oligarchy that brought them rampant illegal immigration, the devaluation of the dollar, the gigantic deficit, 9/11, and hatred of the U.S. around the world. The electorate got bored of drinking Coke so now the establishment is going to provide Pepsi.[/align]

    [align=left]Clinton voted for the Patriot Act and she voted for the war in Iraq, but so many Democrats are blinded by the cult of personality that they will overwhelmingly vote to put this crime family back in office. While we have made some progress in educating liberals as to the phony staged consensus of the left-right paradigm, the fact remains that a majority still see the White House as some kind of political super bowl, where the success of their 'team' is the be all and end all - to the expense of America as a whole.[/align]

    [align=left]"I felt that it was appropriate under the circumstances, which really went back to 1998 under the Clinton administration's conclusion that the regime had to change, that the President (Bush) had authority to pursue that goal," said Hillary after giving her personal approval for the mess in Iraq.[/align]

    [align=left]The punch and judy show theatre of the troop surge debate characterizes Hillary's role in hoodwinking Americans perfectly. The debate is framed as not whether the U.S. should get out of Iraq altogether, but the relative minutia of whether to feed 20,000 more troops into the meat grinder or not. The Democrats play along with this farce and make empty threats of "non-binding resolutions" that have no teeth and mean absolutely nothing. [/align]

    [align=left]Clinton's campaign manager has already compared Hillary to former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and has outlined her style as "Strong on foreign policy. People have got to know you are going to keep them safe." [/align]

    [align=left]This translates as more war, more dead Americans, and a further desecration of the tattered shreds of what's left of the U.S. Constitution. [/align]

    [align=left]Clinton is the ultimate elitist and represents the Democrats supposed base, the poor and downtrodden, about as much as Lindsay Lohan represents grace and dignity. She was sure to inform the likes of David Rockefeller and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands as to her presidential aspirations during her visit to last year's Bilderberg conference in Ottawa Canada. Bilderberg has a proven history of acting in a kingmaker capacity. [/align]

    [align=left]Both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair attended before becoming President and Prime Minister and the media reported that Bilderberg selected John Edwards as Kerry's running mate in 2004. [/align]

    [align=left]Hillary's presidential financiers include Neo-Con kingpin and Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch, with whom she often meets and parties with along with Roger Ailes and other Republican big wigs. While Bill has been hanging around with the Bushes, Hillary has also been living it up with the likes of Newt Gingrich, Bill Frist, John McCain and Rick Santorum.[/align]


    [align=left]We have continually exposed how Clinton and the Bushes personally profited from massive drug smuggling operations through Mena, while Clinton was Governor of Arkansas. Alex Jones has interviewed multiple former CIA officers who were unloading the cocaine. Bush Snr, met eleven times with the Clintons in the year before Clinton announced his run for President. Teenagers Don Henry and Kevin Ives were murdered for accidentally witnessing a CIA cocaine smuggling operation in Mena. Bill Clinton aided in the cover up, as well as the money laundering. The Clinton-Bush relationship is a long and fruitful one.[/align]


    [align=left]The Clintons and the Bushes have been known to vacation together in more recent times. Last year on CBS, Clinton revealed that he looks upon the Bushes as a surrogate family, and how Barbara Bush refers to him as "her son". Is this really a picture of two distinct and opposed political ideologies pitted against one another?[/align]

    [align=left]In 2005, George W invited both Clintons as guests of honor and praised them to the hilt as he unveiled portraits of the two to be hung in the White House. Bush described him as having "...a great compassion for people in need... a man of enthusiasm and warmth". This after Bush's 2000 campaign was built around Clinton having no honor or dignity whilst in the White House.[/align]

    [align=left]A national poll carried in the Washington Post Sunday has Clinton leading closest Democrat contender Sen. Barack Obama by 24% and projects her to beat anyone the Republicans can offer, with the possible exception of former New York Mayor and 9/11 shill Rudolph Giuliani.[/align]

    [align=left]A massive grassroots campaign needs to be activated immediately to challenge liberals who profess anti-war sentiments to vote for a real anti-war candidate, Congressman Ron Paul, a man who voted against the illegal invasion of Iraq unlike Hillary Clinton and who also unlike Hillary is firmly opposed to embroiling America in any further foreign entanglements such as Iran. [/align]

    [align=left]We need to support the stance of Cindy Sheehan, who has vowed to oppose Hillary, and utilize Sheehan's considerable influence to sink Clinton's candidacy. [/align]

    [align=left]At the very least we can take as many votes away from Hillary as possible, even if it means someone like Obama getting in office, and wrestle America free from the ownership of the same gaggle of crooks that have ruthlessly sat on their autocratic power monopoly for the past 30 years.[/align]
    pisshead Reviewed by pisshead on . Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family Pro-war Clinton candidacy success would mean same mob bosses have ruled U.S. since 1980 Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones Prison Planet Monday, January 22, 2007 Another Clinton in office would mean America being under the thiefdom of either a Bush or a Clinton for a total of at least 32 years, 36 if Hillary is re-elected (many now acknowledge that H.W. Bush pulled the strings as VP during the Reagan era), and Rating: 5

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family

    wow, i'm surprised that the anti-constitution neo-cons aren't foaming at the mouth and worshipping hillary...


    "Progressives" Whine About Hillary Bashing


    Once again boiling it down to arguments about gender and the false left-right paradigm [align=left]Steve Watson[/align]


    [align=left]Infowars.net
    Monday, January 22, 2007[/align]

    [align=left]The announcement that Hillary Clinton is to run for President has rightfully worried many into debating the problems of political dynasties in America. Commentators have pointed out that should Hillary be elected it would mean America being under the control of either a Bush or a Clinton for a total of at least 32 years.
    Some "progressives" out there, however, seem to believe that such a move would be...well, progressive.
    In response to an LA Times opinion piece entitled Anyone but a Bush or a Clinton, Lefty website, the Daily Kos today hit back with a Sacchariney blurb about how it is "unfair" to suggest the people should not vote for Hillary because her last name is Clinton. It goes on:[/align]

    Hillary Clinton was on her own a capable, high-powered lawyer with nearly unlimited potential. She chose to partner herself with her husband, and worked with him to raise his profile and possibilities. Would those "she wouldn't be senator" folks be as comfortable if this was turned on its head: Bill Clinton would never have been president without a wife named Hillary. Would someone else have been so competent and supportive in fighting back against the scandals that plagued Bill's career long before he reached the White House? Would someone else have made the connections, raised the money, and been as effective in forging the coalitions that brought Bill up the political ladder?
    [align=left]Once again the crux of the issue is being woefully missed by the "progressives" who seem to become completely detached from any practical debate when the possibility of having a Democrat in office is raised, especially if that Democrat is a woman.
    Yes, the Daily Kos is right, Hillary was complicit in everything Bill Clinton did to grease his way up the ladder, and that is just one reason why she shouldn't become President.
    The piece then goes on to make a bizarre reference to Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of 2004 candidate John Edwards, and suggests he would never have run if it were not for her support for her man, thus revealing itself as a thinly veiled "Hillary's critics are just sexists" rant. The fact that it was reported that Edwards was picked by the elites in the Bilderberg group, seems to matter not.
    If the Daily Kos really wants to be "progressive" it should stop continuously raising the gender issue and telling everyone that women are less powerful than men. Anyone in the right mind knows that some of the most powerful people on this planet are women. One commenter throws in the opinion the Kos was searching to shape further down the page:[/align]

    ...It's sexist and whether she is your candidate or not, it sounds moronic to pretend she would not have been a senator if she had not married Bill Clinton. Indeed she may have gone further faster without him.
    [align=left]Indeed a cursory look at more comments from the piece shows just how a rational debate about the domination of the "chosen few" in politics can veer off course into a wildly irrelevant, sexism, left vs right or even rich vs poor argument:[/align]


    ... I think this posturing is a result of years of rightwing radio and TV assault on the Clintons. People are prepared to not vote Dem if she wins? This reminds of the same bullshit that was happening with Nader before the 2000 election. It's the same tired right wing "Clinton fatigue" & "everyone hates the Clintons" garbage.
    [align=left]Hillary is financed by and parties with the "rightwing" media ...This has been paraded out ad nauseam for months now, and is a comment in almost every diary that has anything to do with Hillary. [/align]

    Its wrong.
    Just because there were two GOP Presidents in the past two decades who are from the same family is no reason to "decide" upfront that a Democratic candidate is not worthy of the office because she is related to a past President.
    [align=left]The Bushes and the Clintons are peas from the same pod[/align]


    ...that's just a ridiculous comparison. Bill Clinton came from a poor (maybe not dirt poor but compared to the Bush's, poor for sure!) family and worked hard for everything he achieved. He knows what it's like to be middle-class, working-class. Nothing guaranteed him the presidency except his own hard-work and political talent. And odds are, he would not have become president were it not for Hillary. I would also suggest that it is very likely that Hillary would have been able to run and win for Senate if she were just Hillary Rodham.
    [align=left]Clinton and the Bushes personally worked together to profit from massive drug smuggling operations through Mena, while Clinton was Governor of Arkansas. His "hard work" consisted of proving to the elite that he could lick boots and roll over as good as anyone else. This is not about rich vs poor and any notion that Bill Clinton represents the working classes is laughable. He passed virtually all the Republican globalist agenda in the early nineties signing onto NAFTA and the WTO.
    What has Clinton ever done for the poorer people of America? He signed the welfare reform Personal Responsibility Act, which forced millions of working class people off welfare. Not so bad in itself, but when you consider that the jobs available to them were purely extremely low wage and slave labor work, it becomes a different matter. It was EARLY into Clinton's second term in office that the manufacturing jobs decline started. Manufacturing employment alone has fallen 3.3 million (19 percent) from its March 1998 peak under Clinton. This trend is simply continuing under Bush as more and more jobs are being exported.[/align]

    ...I reject the idea that two Clinton presidencies make a monarchy and I severely reject ANY comparison of Hillary to G-Dub.
    [align=left]Hilary voted for the war in Iraq

    Hillary voted for the renewal of the PATRIOT ACT
    Hillary has publicly voiced support for warrantless spying
    Hillary has publicly voiced support for torture policies [/align]

    ...Although she can be seen as "friendly" to big business, she is not a corporatist and does not have a record of favoring the wealthy over the working person. That is simply not her record in the Senate.
    [align=left]Hillary is the ultimate elitist and represents the Democrats supposed base, the poor and downtrodden, about as much as Lindsay Lohan represents grace and dignity. She was sure to inform the likes of David Rockefeller and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands as to her presidential aspirations during her visit to last year's Bilderberg conference in Ottawa Canada. [/align]


    ...I suspect Hillary is why you want the law [to bar consecutive family members as Presidents]. To bar a scary smart, effective liberal from running for president.
    Talk about abuse of power.
    And it makes no sense, though the republicans would love you for it. Also anti-american...in the america where we're valued for our individuality and have the (theoretical) freedom to run for office as we wish to. Barring anyone from trying to gain public office based on arbitrary characteristics is patenly offensive.
    [align=left]How is it valuing individuality to have the same two families in office for three decades? Freedom can never be "theoretical" as this "progressive" states.[/align]

    [align=left]These two families are desperate attention loving power mad elitists and want to retain control of their respective political parties. They are using each other to â??soften' their disapproval in the opposite party. We have two simultaneous dynasties - the Bushes and the Clintons. The Bushes are the hand of the Republican arm and the Clintons the hand of the Democratic arm. The body is of course controlled by one mind that outranks them all, the corporate fascist elite.
    It is time to stop missing the point of this debate. Though we are hardly likely to see a rational debate about Hillary from supposedly "anti-war" websites such as the Daily Kos, Crooks and Liars and Raw Story, who are all now running Hillary ads, paid for by her campaign. The Clintons and the Bushes (or the Bushtons as I shall call them from now on) are comparable to the Lucchese and Genovese families: they have their little spats, but at the end of the day they eat their gnocchi from the same table. The Democans and the Republicrats are the left and right hands of a single body. The mind of this body is intent on bare handedly tearing apart freedom and ripping to shreds the constitutional form of governance that was created to bring down this elitist rabble. [/align]

  4.     
    #3
    Senior Member

    Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family

    Thats what I said piss, and I didnt need alex to think for me.....Huuummmmmm?

  5.     
    #4
    Senior Member

    Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family

    Yeah, I'm not enamored with Hillary either. She backed Bush on the war then turned around and accused him of mismanaging it, she was right on the management thesis, but wrong in the first place. She is kinda like Lieberman, a sniveling little worm that is only interested in her own fortune. I say Bah to Hillary, but, if I'm put in the position of having to choose between Hillary or any of the Republicans, I'd have to vote Hillary, and that my friends will be a sad day!
    [SIZE=\"4\"]Amendment IV [/SIZE] The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

  6.     
    #5
    Senior Member

    Hillary Heralds 30 Year Plus Control Of America By Interlocking Crime Family

    ron paul is running as a republican i believe...but he's a real republican, not a george bush big government commie republican...

    he's someone that i can actually feel good about voting for...

Similar Threads

  1. Deaths Per Year From Drugs In America
    By LOC420 in forum Activism
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-13-2010, 05:01 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-14-2008, 04:51 PM
  3. Westboro Baptist Church: The Most Hated Family In America
    By Oneironaut in forum Spirituality
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-15-2007, 01:13 AM
  4. Bush Crime Family Crony Robert Gates a Shoo-In
    By pisshead in forum Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-05-2006, 04:39 PM
  5. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-23-2005, 07:31 AM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook