My theory why god doesn't exist

[AlwaysBlazed]

Ok. I grew up being told about santa claus, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny, the boogeyman, the sandman, the ever infamous stranger, and of course god. When I slowly came to realization that these were not true around the age of 9 I still believed in god longer, but by 12 I just refused to believe that "god" exists. After all the research we have collected and proven against creationism and how there is NO evidence to prove creationism. People want to remain ignorant and claim it's "faith" and that works for some people, but people who claim they are doing acts of violence because of "god" and people thanking "god" sincerely (even I say "thank god" but I use it as an expression). I am not going to just say there is no evidence, but not only is there no evidence but throughout the past the christian church has proven themselves to be corrupt and selfish. There has never been any evidence that god was real except from individuals saying so. How can you blindly worship somebody who doesn't exist? There does not need to be a higher being for life to exist, it's a complex series of chemical reactions over trillions and quadrillions of years. I'm sorry but I just see people who believe in "god" as ignorant people who are afraid of change. If you need somewhere to turn to for hope and faith turn to your family, prey to yourself, not to a false god. Sorry if this came off somewhat hostile but I really don't see any point why people should continue to believe in god anymore. Back in the time of the birth of judaism word spread slow. People believed in god because that was the only plausable theory as to why we were there.

Every coincidence is not a miracle.

If you want to make a comeback make sure its about the topic and not about bashing my spelling or grammer. I'd like to see what the "faithful" have to say about this.

Don't even get me started on scientology.
"The way to make a million dollars is to start a religion."
- L. Ron Hubbard

AlwaysBlazed Reviewed by AlwaysBlazed on 01-21-2007. My theory why god doesn't exist Ok. I grew up being told about santa claus, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny, the boogeyman, the sandman, the ever infamous stranger, and of course god. When I slowly came to realization that these were not true around the age of 9 I still believed in god longer, but by 12 I just refused to believe that "god" exists. After all the research we have collected and proven against creationism and how there is NO evidence to prove creationism. People want to remain ignorant and claim it's "faith" Rating: 5

[smoke it]

i agree with almost everything youve said here, but i garuntee that within the next 3 posts, someones going tear up everything youve just said. whatever. every man his own

[Infernus]

i couldent agree more. Its all science. Not a world a so called god created. Ignorance is for the weak.

[AlwaysBlazed]

I'm glad I got some replies but im really looking for religious people to reply.

[mrdevious]

I'm glad I got some replies but im really looking for religious people to reply.

Why? They've replied countless times to this same accusation (no god), just look in another thread. All you'll get are incoherent arguments based on fallable logic such as "well how did the universe get so organized? that proves god exists!", or the old classic "you can't disprove he exists, therefor the stance for his existence is just as valid as the stance against his existence".

[harris7]

Well Iâ??m going to point out small errors (not flaws) in your argument. But first Iâ??ll summarize some faithful peoples argument (from this site)
It goes a little something like this:
-God exists
-God says he exists
-God is all good so obviously he cannot lie
-So he exists


anyways, think of this as constructive criticism.
You donâ??t want to feed the laypersons view of science, as their misunderstandings is the main point of exploitation by religious figures

After all the research we have collected and proven against creationism and how there is NO evidence to prove creationism.

Very very few things every receive â??proofâ?�. The only way to prove god exists is if he appears and says â??I existâ?�. This kind of absolute proof isnâ??t very prevalent in science. In science we find proof by: The Principle of Converging Evidence.

Anyways, try to talk about support for theories not proof for theories. Creationism has some supporting evidence but not much. This evidence was satisfactory before a competing theory (evolution) appeared which has significantly more support.
Something becomes Fact when it has so much support it is very unlikely that anything else could explain all the data.


I am not going to just say there is no evidence, but not only is there no evidence but throughout the past the christian church has proven themselves to be corrupt and selfish.

Try not to use the word evidence, as it isnâ??t well defined. Use supporting data. Many people draw a causal connection between evidence and proof

There has never been any evidence that god was real except from individuals saying so.
come on man, I just told you not to use evidence like 2 minuets ago. j/k


There does not need to be a higher being for life to exist, it's a complex series of chemical reactions over trillions and quadrillions of years.
System, not series. Series implies randomness, system implies order

Sorry if this came off somewhat hostile but I really don't see any point why people should continue to believe in god anymore.
Honestly man I believe classically religious people to be delusional. Theyâ??ve created a story that answers so many hard questions and proposes such a great thing, that weâ??ve tricked ourselves into believing it. Itâ??s kind of impressive

People believed in god because that was the only plausible theory as to why we were there.
Bingo, Thatâ??s actually Platoâ??s argument. It was valid until evolution was proposed.

Every coincidence is not a miracle.
Are any. Not IMO

[Polymirize]

Way to go Harris. Way to teach alwaysblazed how to post exactly like you. Like clones or robots, but at least you don't have any silly religious beliefs I guess.

As for this though:

System, not series. Series implies randomness, system implies order

Why not series? Unless you secretly believe in some sort of universal order.
Which I gotta say, is not sufficiently supported by the evidence...

[halospaceboy]

maby god is a higher power, anyone see the program (ufo's in the bible)

[harris7]

Way to go Harris. Way to teach alwaysblazed how to post exactly like you. Like clones or robots, but at least you don't have any silly religious beliefs I guess.
As for this though:
Why not series? Unless you secretly believe in some sort of universal order.
Which I gotta say, is not sufficiently supported by the evidence...

Personally I would prefer clones. as i have really nice hair and there really should be more of it around

Oh trust me I have some crazy beliefs, nothing as crazy as a supernatural god, but still out there.

I know and despise the tactics used to confuse people and Iâ??m just trying to show other likeminded individuals some of the things they capitalize on.
Anyways iâ??m pretty sure A/B isnâ??t going to find the reply he is looking for

Hmm well I consider Evolution to by a complex system. But I guess you are right it could also be a series. As in math series are very ordered. Itâ??s just to me the connotation of the word implies much less order. Itâ??s just semantics

[mrdevious]

It's an old classic because it's a bloody good argument. No one can disprove it.

Basically it comes down to one fact; If God exists for one person, then he exists for that person. And if God does not exist for another person, then he does not exist for that person.

God can't be proven, and he can't be disproven. It's impossible. It's purely down to personal preference. Simple as that.

LOL, it's a bloody TERRIBLE argument! It is impossible to disprove anything that doesn't exist, because proof only exists in relation to something else that exists. If your logic is true, that the inability to disprove god puts him on equal grounds to the inability to prove god, then lets expand: There's a microscopic teacup floating around some sun somewhere in the galaxy, there are invisible jellyfish that fly around the universe playing metallica on their flute, there's a god named Thor who's a blacksmith and makes weapons for the other gods. Can you disprove any of these? If not, then all these theories and the millions of other ones I can conjure up are now equally valid and as likely as god or no god. But why don't we consider the invisible flute-blowing metalhead jellyfish just as likely? Because the inability to disprove them means nothing more than anything else the imagination can create, it's up to you to prove the existence, not for me to prove the non-existence.