I hear you, and you make perfect sense. I mean, I think that Timothy Leary felt that he was doing educational/research/scientific work with his experiments, and he was. But the thing here is that how somebody else interprets information in detailed responses, particularly information that talks about mind-expanding and psychedelic experiences, is completely subjective. So what you might interpret as educational/scientific information might, to an adventurous 15-year-old, be interpreted as an endorsement or suggestion to try it.

Don't get me wrong here. I know we're not going to prevent people/kids from trying various substances. But the reason we try and maintain the cannabis-only policy is to keep folks concentrating on the gentler substance this board is about--and to make sure that subjective interpretation is at least limited to cannabis, which is pretty tame compared to some of the others that come up (and get taken down) here from time to time. Hope that makes sense!