Quote Originally Posted by 420ultimatesmokage
his very first premise is that measurement is infinite which is not the case, there is a very real limit to what we can measure accurately or with any certainty.my argument about space applies equally to time seeing as how they are part of the same fabric. he then goes on saying if we know everything about a moment then we would be suspended in time. im saying that we can't know everything there is to know about a moment because of the uncertainty principle.
Ok. I agree that his premises are extremely flawed to start with. I accept the argument from quantum mechanics. I just think that by attempting to connect a system of measurement to the "real world", you need to follow him on his first couple steps, and logically, no you can disarm his entire argument before it draws its first breath.


And as for ten dimensions. Current string theory which postulates ten dimensions usually holds that the missing six rolled up and shrank to the size of the planck length. They're here, they're just to small to interact in any meaningful way (?). I think in appealing to multiple dimensions you're going a little far of the esoteric field.
Polymirize Reviewed by Polymirize on . My theory on infinite conprehension in measurement. Okay I have this theory. Measurement is infinite. A figure can always be measured to a greater degree than it currently is. Because of this, if a being could conprehend everything at the moment it happened, it could possibly become fixed in time understanding the time that it in. What do you think? Rating: 5