Results 1 to 10 of 19
-
01-10-2007, 03:44 AM #1OPSenior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Maybe soon we hold one for Bush/Chaney.:thumbsup:
IRAN: MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT TRY TO IMPEACH AHMADINEJAD
Tehran, 9 Jan. (AKI) - Iranian reformist lawmakers have started collecting signatures in Parliament to demand the impeachment of the country's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. So far, 38 signatures have been collected out of the 72 required to formally summon Ahmadinejad and request his impeachment. Noureddin Pirmouzen, a deputy with the reformist minority, says it is nonetheless "positive to question" the head of the executive branch.
"Many actions of the current government and of president Ahmadinejad have led the country to an extremely worrying political and economic situation," Pirmouzen told the Iranian news website Aftab.
Referring to a resolution of the UN Security Council unanimously approved on 23 December which imposes sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear programme, the MP said "it is the last straw which has made Iranians loose their patience." The international community fears Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons and has repeatedly asked the government to halt sensitive nuclear work - a demand ignored by Tehran which claims its programme is solely for civilian use.
"Parliament cannot sit still in front of the current situation and watch as the economy worsens because of the government's inability," he added.
Issa Saharkhiz, editor and political analyst, told Adnkronos International (AKI) that "Ahmadinejad's golden era is over."
"I don't think Ahmadinejad will leave the presidency before his mandate expires but I am also convinced he will not succeed in winning a second term," added Saharkhiz. "Many factions and personalities who supported Ahmadinejad's candidature at the 2005 presidential elections have already abandoned him and don't spare criticism, even harsh and direct, of the president and his government."
Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad became president after an overwhelming victory in June 2005 but his then contender, Ali-Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, and moderate conservative rivals of the president did far better than Ahmadinejad's allies in December polls to elect local councils and the powerful watchdog, the Assembly of Experts.Zimzum Reviewed by Zimzum on . Iranian Impeachment? Maybe soon we hold one for Bush/Chaney.:thumbsup: IRAN: MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT TRY TO IMPEACH AHMADINEJAD Tehran, 9 Jan. (AKI) - Iranian reformist lawmakers have started collecting signatures in Parliament to demand the impeachment of the country's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. So far, 38 signatures have been collected out of the 72 required to formally summon Ahmadinejad and request his impeachment. Noureddin Pirmouzen, a deputy with the reformist minority, says it is nonetheless Rating: 5
-
01-10-2007, 04:14 PM #2Senior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Yeah, you're right , If we could only get one started for Bush-Cheney. Can you say Nancy Pelosi for president. I don't have a clue how she'd be, but I know that she could be no worse than them. Hell, maybe she'd even stop the war!~ But you'd have to do them both, and they surely deserve it!!!
[SIZE=\"4\"]Amendment IV [/SIZE] The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
-
01-10-2007, 04:28 PM #3Senior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Originally Posted by medicinal
Have a good one!:jointsmile:
-
01-10-2007, 05:00 PM #4OPSenior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
-
01-11-2007, 02:04 PM #5Senior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Originally Posted by Zimzum
This is one of them,"which came first-the chicken or the egg ?" situations,if we fail to police the world,will there be an America to fix ?
You think America has problems now..just try to fix a smoking waste-land.
No matter how much ya wish it could be,ya can't roll the clock back to before 9/11/01..yer gonna have to deal with the truth about Islam,muslim-jihadists and the muslim hordes that seek to destroy the Free World.
You have the choice to opt-out,just git ya a copy of the koran and start studying for yer conversion,set up a savings account to pay yer jizra tax and you'll be good to go ! Plus,as a muslim-convert,you will have gained the right to commit any atrocity that you so desire,then blame yer actions on Bush and America..pretty spiffy,huh ?
Have a good one ! :jointsmile:
-
01-11-2007, 02:59 PM #6Senior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Originally Posted by Torog
granted, we have been attacked and need to respond, but the WHOLE world? with the poverty and ignorance running rampant in this country, maybe some of those billions of war dollars might be better spent at home. after all, a contented population will be more vigilant and more apt to police themselves than a country as divided as ours has become. the u.s., running around sticking our nose into other people"s affairs and blowing things up, is only postponing future terrorist actions inside this country.
-
01-12-2007, 02:28 PM #7Senior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity
America has thrown billions of dollars at ignorance and poverty,not only here,but around the world..but it still happens,anyhow. When ya say "a contented population",that makes me think of a population that's asleep at the wheel. Our country has become divided,because yer side is content to enjoy the freedom that you have already,while at the same time,y'all are making excuses for those who choose to commit violence against others..yer side even believes that America deserves it and that the innocents who perished on 9/11/01,were most deserving,because they are 'little eichmanns'.
According to yer logic,we shouldn't have stuck our noses in,when saddam invaded Kuwait,that we should have just looked away,while saddam's troops were looting,raping and pillaging.
Have a good one ...
-
01-12-2007, 02:43 PM #8Senior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Torog you are right on point.....
Maybe someday ill be as level headed as you.......
Naaaaaaaa
LOL
have a Good one Torog
-
01-12-2007, 03:27 PM #9OPSenior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Originally Posted by Torog
In no way did it concern our national safety other than the flow of oil. After the first gulf war cancer and birth defect rates jumped up by 1000% in the area. We sent our troops back home with gulf war syndrome. And today we still use depleted uranium.
Unless it is an absolute threat to our nations safety with real evidence. No soldier or citizen should have to die. Alli or enemy.
"looting, raping, pillaging" have all been done by US forces as well.. Civil war, Vietnam, Korea
-
01-12-2007, 03:57 PM #10Senior Member
Iranian Impeachment?
Your hate for america is shining.....Zim
The civil war? you want to get into it......?
So what zim is saying freeing the slaves was not worth dieing for....HUH?
I beg to differ......
Vietnam..... we went in with a noble mission...it went bad cause of the left wing nut job weaking our resolve to win...alla Jane Fonda.
Zim you forgot to mention the killing fields? why?
Korea.......
Look at the south... 6th biggest economy in the world
North a fuck stain on the sheets of the world.....( goverment, not the people)
Bring it ZIM
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
A Widening Chasm on Impeachment
By fishman3811 in forum PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 05-23-2007, 07:23 AM -
The Democrats and the Impeachment Clause
By fishman3811 in forum PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 05-12-2007, 07:09 PM -
What about impeachment
By medicinal in forum PoliticsReplies: 72Last Post: 12-17-2006, 05:58 AM -
Last Hope For Impeachment
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 04-08-2006, 03:29 AM -
Here's something for you impeachment moonbats
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 5Last Post: 01-18-2006, 05:39 PM