Very well, I see my ideas arent' going to be met with much acceptance. But these are just my ideas nontheless. Whether or not they'll prove true or false, I hope I'll get to find out some day. I don't see the reason for all the hostility toward my ideas (from everyone) though; these aren't even theories, just some interesting ideas that seem to make sense to me. I make no claim to their validity beyond some toying with concepts.


If peace were natural, we would be practicing it, what is natural for humans is survival at all costs(it is the very root of being a human, and you can see it practiced anywhere large or small scale).
I think you misunderstand me. I know that aggression, competition, dominance, all these things are natural. They are some key elements to the evolutionary process. But what I'm talking about isn't the complex natural drives that control most organisms, I'm talking about the natural and final state of reality. What I mean to say is that through extinction of our primal, instinctive nature, through extinction of the ego and sense of separation, we can see the most natural state of being there is, perfect harmony with the ultimate. That, in my humble opinion, is the most natural state of all because it is the basis of our existence. The primal drives that direct organism behavior is the considerably more complex result of this base nature.


Secondly, you over-worded many things you said.
I'm very stoned on tramadol (legally through prescription) and weed, it's not always easy to piece together ones thoughts.


Thirdly, where you stand on views of reality is a bit presumptuous, given that to explain what you think reality may be, alone defies what you state about reality; If everything and nothing were the same, I don't think a distinction could have ever been formed.

I disagree. As I was trying to convey, the separation is a result of more complex systems creating new forms for reality to take. Which I suppose may be responsible for the rules in relativity, but I'm no expert in that field.

And lastly, your ideas of reality are on par with Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawking's third grade journals. (This is not meant to insult, merely enlighten that you should do more work before stating half ideas half beliefs.)
I'm not familiar with Michio Kaku and only partially familar with Hawking's works. I didn't intend to state these as absolute beliefs, just ideas, a hypothesis from certain observations.
mrdevious Reviewed by mrdevious on . How I see reality and existence From my perspective the quantum universe is both infinite and one, nothing and something. People often ask how the universe could exist, how something could come out of nothing. I don't think anything came out of anything else, I think we are fooled by the illusion that "something" and "nothing" are distinctly separate things. If you break down matter to atoms, then atoms to their nucleus, the nucleus to it's subatomic particles that now exist on the quantum level... certain notions of Rating: 5