If peace were natural, we would be practicing it, what is natural for humans is survival at all costs(it is the very root of being a human, and you can see it practiced anywhere large or small scale). Secondly, you over-worded many things you said. Thirdly, where you stand on views of reality is a bit presumptuous, given that to explain what you think reality may be, alone defies what you state about reality; If everything and nothing were the same, I don't think a distinction could have ever been formed. And lastly, your ideas of reality are on par with Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawking's third grade journals. (This is not meant to insult, merely enlighten that you should do more work before stating half ideas half beliefs.)