Report: US discussing strikes on Iran

[Ed Ward MD]

Report: US discussing strikes on Iran
By DOUGLAS DAVIS

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...=1101010793582

LONDON â?? Pentagon officials are said to be discussing possible military action to neutralize Iran's nuclear weapons threat, according to a report in London's Observer. US administration sources are quoted as saying that air strikes â?? "either by the US or Israel" â?? to wipe out Iran's fledgling nuclear program would be difficult because of a lack of clear intelligence about where key components are located.

Instead, sources quoted by the paper said the Pentagon is considering strikes in support of regime change, including attacks on the leadership, as well as on political and security targets
.
The new "modeling" at the Pentagon, with its shift in emphasis from suspected nuclear sites to political target lists, is said to be causing deep anxiety among officials in Britain, France, and Germany, who last week appeared to have negotiated a deal with Teheran to cease work that could contribute to a nuclear weapons program. But Washington is said to be skeptical about the deal.

Ed Ward, MD,
Founder, LA-CRC, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LA-CRC/
Founder, LSMP, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LSMP/
edward19(at)cox.net (at) = @ (for the @ crawlers) my email.
http://thepriceofliberty.org/ward.htm
https://www.quickbase.com/db/99r7qj9...sineConsulting (Class action lawsuit state info)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/louisi...rightscouncil/ (LA state info)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LA-CRC/ [Louisiana Civil Rights Council Message Board]
Learn about your Family and Individual Constitutional Rights and this governments Constitutional Restrictions and Vote.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Ed Ward MD Reviewed by Ed Ward MD on 11-22-2004. Report: US discussing strikes on Iran Report: US discussing strikes on Iran By DOUGLAS DAVIS http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1101010793582 LONDON â?? Pentagon officials are said to be discussing possible military action to neutralize Iran's nuclear weapons threat, according to a report in London's Observer. US administration sources are quoted as saying that air strikes â?? "either by the US or Israel" â?? to wipe out Iran's fledgling nuclear program would be difficult because Rating: 5

[Libertarian Toker]

Iran has a deal to stop it's nuke building in place and already accepted by Britain, Germany and France. I doubt we will be going into Iran any time soon. The Sudan maybe, but not Iran.

Toker

[BayBoat]

If we're going to strike...we'd better do it soon before they get nukes...no need for troops, just a few days of gps guided bunker busting "shock and awe" ought to set them back a decade or two.

nice and neat

[pisshead]

yeah, let's just bomb the shit out of the entire world until they all accept freedom.

[Ed Ward MD]

bomb the shit out of em till they accept freedom.

Don't need to worry about it, Lib Toke has the inside scope, he knows more than the people there. I really need to start getting all my opinion BS from him, screw the propaganda facts. It's LT's opinion that is the only non propaganda truth and for real acceptable version. The US was not talking about invading Iran has no intentions of invading Iran because LT knows more than the people involved. Who knew? Who coulda figured? Don't think so? He has a dictionary to prove it.

Ed

[Libertarian Toker]

I'm sure we have lots of plans, for lots of screwed up stuff. I was just saying that with the new deal it looks as if there may not be a war in Iran. I was also saying that it looks like the Sudan may have a better chance at military action then Iran. If you don't want people to comment on what you post, why do you post it?

Toker

[Ed Ward MD]

why do you post them?

TR E WAR, III

[Libertarian Toker]

That doesn't answer the question I asked. Are you scared to answer, or unable?

Toker

[Ed Ward MD]

It's all propaganda.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please define some more words for me. Your word activism is awesome.

TR E WAR, III

[thecrackbaby]

Are you kidding? LT is an expert on world affairs, and he didnt even finish high school.