Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
1794 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1.     
    #21
    Senior Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
    LOL....better check again my friend. You don't think that the U.S. has a couple of silos in Canada? Russia is just across the pole dude. They may not be yours but your holding our stash.....same penalty.

    Have a good one!:jointsmile:
    Well I donâ??t pay for them and my country doesnâ??t support them. I am only morally responsible for my actions not the actions of the US.
    I donâ??t agree with us holding them but they are still The USâ??s and it really doesnâ??t matter if there in Washington or Canada. Another Nuke is another Nuke.

  2.     
    #22
    Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by harris7
    Well I donâ??t pay for them and my country doesnâ??t support them. I am only morally responsible for my actions not the actions of the US.
    I donâ??t agree with us holding them but they are still The USâ??s and it really doesnâ??t matter if there in Washington or Canada. Another Nuke is another Nuke.
    Something I found on Wikipedia while researching nuclear weapons involving Canada. We're not off the hook completely. Sucks eh? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_...ss_destruction

    "Canada has long been closely linked with the United States' nuclear weapons program. The Manhattan Project was the product of a secret agreement between the USA, Canada and the UK, signed in Québec City in August 1943. Canada contributed help from Canadian scientists, policy supervision by C.D. Howe and uranium from Canadian mines (other uranium sources included the American Southwest and the Belgian Congo). Since Canada had just become the recipient of the world's supply of heavy water, it was also hoped that Canada could manufacture plutonium for the bomb effort. Canada developed a superior process for plutonium extraction, but no Canadian reactor was completed until just after the end of the war. After the Second World War Canada became a world leader in nuclear research through its Chalk River Laboratories. The NRX reactor and a small plutonium extraction plant were built there in 1947, and supplied plutonium for the first British bomb. For the next twenty years, the Chalk River Laboratories (later incorporated into Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) ) continued to sell plutonium to the USA's military weapons program. Canadian research was shared freely with the United States and played an important role in the continued development of American nuclear weapons."

  3.   Advertisements

  4.     
    #23
    Senior Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by HinduKush83

    Thank goodness Canada doesn't have any nukes.
    You absolute on that? And in a country that 90% of its people live within 100 miles of the US boarder. Do you think the fallout would just stop at the boarder if the US was hit?

  5.     
    #24
    Senior Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueCat
    God if you are out there and listening....please stop them. This will start the war of all wars....

    [align=left]â??Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.â?ť[/align]

    [align=left]â?? I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.â?ť[/align]

    [align=left]He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.â?ť[/align]

    [align=left]Albert Einstein[/align]
    Havent you heard?
    Voice of god revealed to be the voice of dick cheney on a intercom.
    And i thought christianity was a poor religion that could only afford one god. geez.

    dai*ma:stoned:
    In other news *beep* *beep* *beep*..."president" bushs trust in the american people hits an all time low, as he now wants to start reading our mail

  6.     
    #25
    Senior Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by daima
    In other news *beep* *beep* *beep*..."president" bushs trust in the american people hits an all time low, as he now wants to start reading our mail
    He can read?
    \"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will, within limits drawn by the equal rights of others. I do not add \"within the limits of the law\', because law if often but the tyrant\'s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.\"-Thomas Jefferson.

  7.     
    #26
    Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by wrasler
    f.y.i. hindu kush, the jews inhabited present-day israel for over four thousand years, up until they were expelled by the romans after a failed revolt in 132 a.d. the arab population filled the gap after that and was the somewhat exclusive inhabitants until the jewish movement to return to their homeland. the partition the u.n. passed in 1948 would have had the jewish and arab population coexisting, each with an equal share of land and their own sovereignty. however, the day the british troops left, 5 surrounding arab nations (the invaders also include the palestinians) invaded the israeli side and got their asses kicked by the jews. on top of that, several other times israel has been attacked by its muslim neighbors, and has not once taken over arab land unless first provoked. WHAT THE FUCK HAVE THEY DONE THAT IS WRONG?!?
    sorry for the history schpeel, but seriously, how do you figure the arabs are the "rightful" owners of the land??
    Judaism is a just a religion and what we call "Judaism" today was formed after the Babylonian exile when it was mixed with Babylonian religion...hence the idea of good and evil and the concept of a Devil. What we call the "Old Testament" could possibly be written in the 400-500's BC although fundamentalists will take it that it was written by Moses during the Sinai wandering around 1400 BC.

    You were missing the point though. Today's Arabs and the Jews of the past pretty much shared the same Semetic genetics, so hence that is why they are called brothers. They were the same people! They were not white people as most Jews are today. They were what you would call today's Arabs.

    Now the Jews were expelled from that land during the Exile and hence we have the Lost Tribes of Israel who went to other lands and were never heard from again because they adapted to the cultures and customs of the peoples they came in contact with. When the Jews returned to Palestine, they rebuilt the Temple and then they were occupied by the Romans in which they were finally expelled when Titus destroyed Herod's Temple. They again spread out keeping their religion but now they were white and of European genetics now.

    The concept of Zionism was actually conceived in the 19th century, so it is rather new. The British encouraged Jews to settle Palestine. For what reason, that bewilders me. I don't see how they could not have foreseen problems with the Muslim Arabs.

    To me, Zionism is pretty dangerous because it is based on a radical view of the Bible and its the same as the Muslim jihadist's radical view of the Quran. The radical Jews are just as guilty as the radical Muslims.

    I don't think any person with a clear and rational mind would think its a good idea for radical Jews to retake a land that was taken thousands of years ago.

    You don't see Zoroastrians killing Muslims to take back Iran do you? You don't see Druids killing Christians to take back Europe after the Christianizing do you? Because they have gotten over it and have accepted it and have moved on. Why can't the Jews accept this?

    History is history my friend. If you are so obsessed and want to defend giving back the Jews the land that they were exiled from 2,000 years ago, you have problems and need a hobby. The Americans did not make slavery illegal until the Emancipation Proclamation in 1865, and yet the Americans have still not made reparations for enslaving blacks. Whenever I talk to an American about that, a good chunk say that they shouldn't because they didn't enslave them and they believe the past is the past. And you want to say that America should support and defend Israel an take away the land that Arabs have been living on for 2,000 years? Doesn't make sense and it is damn fishy to me. And don't use the Holocaust as an excuse for Israel being there. I agree to an extent that the Holocaust was exaggerated. The schoolbooks forget to mention that Hitler killed more people then Jews. He first killed communists.

    Would you like it if the North American Natives said one day to the Americans and Canadians "We want our land back that you took from us in blood, and if you do not give it back to us, we will kill you and your children"? I mean the Americans did put the Indians on reservations, but yet you don't see them today shouting violent slogans.

    Believe me...I am not anti-semitic at all and I think it would be wonderful for these people to live side by side as they are rooted in the same religious and philosophical beliefs. But killing each other in Jehovah's or Allah's name and driving the Arabs off of their land is wrong and immoral and I will not support the current state of Israel unless Palestinians and Jews agree to have a SECULAR and democratic state in that region where both Jews and Muslims can live and worship together.

    Also, what do you think Jesus would say about this? Jesus looked just like an Arab and I he would definitely not approve of the genocide and would tell the Jews to forget about having their own religious state because it will only lead to more violence and chaos.

  8.     
    #27
    Senior Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    You oversimplfy the "genetics" part. I would suggest that you refer to cultural and religous comparisons, because human genetics are much too complicated to put into a political discussion - unless you are an expert at that science.

    "Today's Arabs" are considered, genetically, to be Indo-European. The other races are Native American, East Asian, and African. Some people, of course, have several of these in their genes.

  9.     
    #28
    Senior Member

    Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by harris7
    Torog,
    Thanks for summing up in two pictures everything I hate about America
    Howdy harris7,

    Yer welcome ! Glad I could oblige ya !

    Say..shouldn't ya be gittin a copy of the koran and be studying for yer conversion ?

    Have a good one ! :jointsmile:

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Israel shows abilities for Iran strike
    By Psycho4Bud in forum Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 11:44 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-02-2007, 01:19 AM
  3. Iran, Israel and nuclear weapons
    By deadfan420 in forum Politics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-26-2007, 04:38 PM
  4. US planning strike against Iran
    By Torog in forum Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-02-2006, 12:48 PM
  5. Who will strike first, Iran or Israel?
    By Psycho4Bud in forum Politics
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-11-2005, 08:09 PM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook