Results 1 to 10 of 25
Threaded View
-
01-10-2007, 01:12 AM #21Senior Member
The Troops DO NOT want reinforcements
Did you even bother to read the links? That'll answer your questions.Read them, kinda hazy reading, not too factual as I see them, but then why didn't Bush attack syria or just a missle strike on the locations, Maybe because Syria didn't have all that oil! Just an Idea! Trying to justify the Iraqi war is a non-starter with me. There is just no reasonable explanation other than Oil and big contracts for Haliburton! all this WMD bullshit is a non-entity, there were no connections to Al-Queda, No yellow cake, all bullshit! As I've stated several times, A war for profit! Period!
[SIZE=\"4\"]Amendment IV [/SIZE] The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Similar Threads
-
US considering troops for Pakistan
By texas grass in forum Current EventsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-09-2008, 01:59 PM -
more troops?
By medicinal in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 12-15-2006, 03:11 AM -
hi troops
By andy1874 in forum Introduce YourselfReplies: 2Last Post: 06-11-2006, 09:06 PM -
Troops in Iraq
By Smokey McPot in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 2Last Post: 09-06-2005, 05:38 AM -
Endangering the Troops
By Torog in forum PoliticsReplies: 11Last Post: 09-03-2005, 11:41 PM