UFO Sighting

[Psycho4Bud]

i linked the whole vid on the area 51 thread...
i don't think anyone watched it!

ALWAYS making assuptions.......LOL. I found the "nuclear" issues very interesting. If what they say is true, seems that "Big Brother" may be a bit beyond what it was initially thought of.

I'm going to try to find a bit more info on that crash in Norway....if I do I'll post it.

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

[Psycho4Bud]

1962 April 18th: Las Vegas, U.S.A
One of the most intriguing crash reports to have surfaced over the years is a report of a crash that occurred in the Air Force Base of Nellis AFB, Nevada in 1962. For many years this case was thought of nothing more than a rumour amongst UFO researchers. However, reports and statements from many eyewitnesses slowly emerged, enough so, for researchers to start digging for more information.

The object was first spotted over Oneida, New York and was heading in a westerly direction. There were also reports of the object in Kansas, Colorado and Eureka, Utah. The object was the seen in the town of Reno, Nevada and was seen to 'turn' and head towards Nevada, where it disappeared over the Nellis Air Force Base. The object was also tracked at several radar sights.

The object was reported by over a thousand people, most of whom, assumed that the object was a meteorite. Various newspapers covered the story the following morning although most of them concluded also that it must of been just a very spectacular meteorite.

However, Air Defence Command, after watching the object for several hours scrambled several fighters (not something that they do for meteorites normally !).

It was claimed the object came down near Eureka, and at the same time the town experienced a total blackout. However, the object was then seen to take off again, and as it did the power came back.

The object was also seen at various times by several commercial airline pilots who reported that the object was below them, again unusual for a meteorite.

The official air force explanation was that the object witnessed was a meteor. However, this does not explain why fights were scrambled, why the object changed course, why the object appeared to land and then take off again.
http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1687.htm

LOL.....4-18-62.....MY BIRTHDAY!! This could explain why I just can't relate to you damn humans!!:yippee:
Nanu, nanu.....glurk, glurk, gleep

Have a good one and also.......live long and prosperous:jointsmile:

[Markass]

well, fuck what "they" saw.
US Gov't (aka FAA) laughed in their faces, yes, right in the pilot's faces.
i believe my government

lol, my government told me that marijuana caused cancer and killed brain cells.

[Tokudai]

I find it rather arrogant for humans to believe that in all of the incomprehensibly vast near-infinity that is the universe, there is only one form of intelligent life dwelling on (from the perspective of the universe at whole) a quite insignificant planet.

Agreed 100%

A small peek from the Hubble telescope - those are galaxies..

[medicinal]

I find it rather arrogant for humans to believe that in all of the incomprehensibly vast near-infinity that is the universe, there is only one form of intelligent life dwelling on (from the perspective of the universe at whole) a quite insignificant planet.

Wait, did you say intelligent life on this planet, whoa now, I find that hard to believe!

[Hamlet]

I watched some of the Area 51 video and all of the Youtube NPC conference. Sorry to say it was pretty much a conference of very sincere crackpots. Some seemingly had credentials, but really listening closely to what they had to say could not be construed as 'proof' of Extra Terrestrial interventions.

A couple of them had some pretty good stories about lights in the sky. That's about it. Most were just in there screaming conspiracy. The first guest speaker who claimed video and documentation shook a tape and a stack of papers around, but never played the tape? Why? He said himself he thought at the time it was an airforce figher plane. He couldn't tell the difference between an airplane and something that would be a hundred thousand times more advanced? His whole bitch was that the Gov. told him to shut the fuck up about UFOs. <--(plenty of good reasons for that besides their being real)

Then there was the whole 'proof' business. So they came up with a whole lot of flakes who would swear before Congress that they saw a light in the sky, saw a blip on radar, or that someone took a document from them, or told them to shut up. Sorry, but that's not proof. Neither was their 'anti-gravity' engine design without scientific verification. Why not have a few Cornell professors up there with them saying "yes, this tech. is real and this would work?" Because all Scientists and Academics are in on the 'Conspiracy'?

The most absurd statement though, was that at least two Presidents and Congress were denied access to this information by the CIA and the Pentagon. (bet they got that idea from Independence Day) Both the President and Congress could drag the head of any agency in and fire their ass or have them prosecuted if they didn't cooperate. (but that just means the 'Illuminati' are all powerful, right?)

But the one dead giveaway that strips all their credibility is that they marched in there claiming they had absolute proof of Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence when they didn't. It doesn't matter what degrees or former positions they held, if they claim absolute proof they need to put the fuckin' raygun or working model of the anti-gravity device on the table or shut the fuck up. (BYU jumped the gun and claimed they discovered Cold Fusion a couple years back but it turned out to be bullshit--that's a lot of Ph.ds with fancy degrees that had to eat crow when the data was scrutinized). A credible source wouldn't claim proof without having it. And a credible source is self-critical. (watch how SETI works-they never make claims, and wouldn't without hard facts. They'll say from time to time 'this was interesting but unrepeatable and therefore unsubstanciated)

Anyway, the best arguments for E.T. are the probabilities. Mathematically it would be very improbable that there is no other life in the Universe. But it's also just as improbable that they've visited Earth.--at least improbable for flying saucer-type aliens that can travel faster than the speed of light, but are too stupid to keep from being detected or crashing.

If you're interested in ET investigations with at least a shred of credibility, check out SETI. They work hard to keep it legit and put as much distance between themselves and the paranoid cults as they can.

[twist n shout]

About 20 yrs. ago,myself & a friend saw a ufo here in Idaho.It was late at nite & we couldnt believe what we were seeing.It couldnt have been anything other than a ufo.There simply is not any other explanation for it.I totally believe in extra terrestrial life.

[nikweiser]

ya i do too. i mean think about it, we have proved evolution on our planet which is one of billions and billions and billions and billions of fuckin planets in this universe.. THINK ABOUT IT
i hate when people are so blunt to that and are like yeah right there is no aliens you nerd.. i hella belive in that shit

[closeddoors]

Heeey, I posted this earlier but nobody seems to be watching it. So please...watch this...it is very interesting. I'd like to hear all your thoughts about it.

UFO - The greatest Story Ever Denied

http://www.jonhs.net/freemovies/ufo.htm

UFO - The greatest Story Ever Denied

[Delta9 UK]

It wasn't so long ago that "we" thought the Earth was flat.

So much for what we know at a given time eh?