Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
1648 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

View Poll Results: What should be done about Iran ?

Voters
4. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hope that diplomacy works

    4 100.00%
  • Multi-pronged attack,with conventional weapons

    1 25.00%
  • Accelerate the RNEP program,(nuclear bunker-busters)

    1 25.00%
  • Allow Iran to nuke Tel-Aviv and London first-before responding

    1 25.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47
  1.     
    #11
    Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    Quote Originally Posted by BayBoat
    350 targets...thats all?

    Im sure we have 350 gps guided bunker busters

    probably take about 15 minutes...no more iran nuclear bomb worries for 10 -20 years

    Or we can HOPE that these REASONABLE people wont develop one

    and HOPE thata major western city isnt vaporized by some crazed mullah

    i vote for the sure thing

    how about just nuking america, the most evil nation on earth, and the source of most of the worlds problems?

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #12
    Senior Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    Oh cracky, if only everyone thought like you...then we would have world peace and children from all different cultures joining hands and singing "kumbaya"
    ~007~

  4.     
    #13
    Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Oh cracky, if only everyone thought like you...then we would have world peace and children from all different cultures joining hands and singing "kumbaya



    You cant join amerikkka, they would cut off your welfare and make you work

  5.     
    #14
    Senior Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    I don't see why you're against America, cracky. Your definition of work seems to always be "grow maryjuana", which doesn't make sense. Without the States imposing their drug prohibition laws on Canada and abroad, there would be no need for "hard-working" maryjuana growers. The States are keeping you in business my friend.
    BTW: growing maryjuana isn't work. It's a hobby, and it's not the hardest thing in the world to do. Maryjuana was grown around the fallout site of Chernobyl so that the plants could absorb some of the radioactive waste...if pot can grow there, it can grow pretty much anywhere else.
    ~007~

  6.     
    #15
    Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    I don't see why you're against America, cracky. Your definition of work seems to always be "grow maryjuana", which doesn't make sense



    My def of work is anything that gets you paid, not including welfare or panhandling, the maritimers def of work.



    Without the States imposing their drug prohibition laws on Canada and abroad, there would be no need for "hard-working" maryjuana growers. The States are keeping you in business my friend.


    Growing MJ isnt my business. My day job is my bidness, growing MJ is for me to smoke. Do you comprehend this? I smoke everything i grow, i never said MJ for profit. In fact i have said more than once to you i have legit day job



    BTW: growing maryjuana isn't work. It's a hobby, and it's not the hardest thing in the world to do


    Then you should do it, instead of being a lazy maritimer.

  7.     
    #16
    Senior Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    our troops are being stretched to thin iraq afganistan 30000 still on korean border, theres not enough american troops, do you think iran will just let us blow the weapons sites up? We need to rely on the EU and UN as well as economic threats, its been a while since america put an embarrgo on a country on all the imports from all over the world.
    The Edge ... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over Hunter S. Thompson

  8.     
    #17
    Senior Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    Quote Originally Posted by juggalo420
    our troops are being stretched to thin iraq afganistan 30000 still on korean border, theres not enough american troops, do you think iran will just let us blow the weapons sites up? We need to rely on the EU and UN as well as economic threats, its been a while since america put an embarrgo on a country on all the imports from all over the world.
    Howdy juggalo420,

    The mullahs of Iran,ain't gonna be very happy,if we start blowing things up-the alternative,letting them have a nuke,is far worse..as they are itching to use a nuke,on Israel.

    How do you feel about Israel ? Do you think that Iran should nuke them ?

  9.     
    #18
    Senior Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    Quote Originally Posted by Torog
    Howdy juggalo420,

    The mullahs of Iran,ain't gonna be very happy,if we start blowing things up-the alternative,letting them have a nuke,is far worse..as they are itching to use a nuke,on Israel.

    How do you feel about Israel ? Do you think that Iran should nuke them ?
    I think israel can take care of themselves, they have nukes themselves so thats a good deterent against iran nuking them. By the way im not against bombing iran cause it'll make the mullahs mad im against it cause it wont be that simple, Iran actually has a army and may still have chemical weapons left over from the iran-iraq war in the 80s, iran also borders both iraq and afganistan so are you willing to risking them using chemical weapons against our troops in those countrys. Even best case scenerio they dont use chemical weapons, guarentened theyll invade iraq, do you think our army can defeat the iranian army(which wouldnt be a pushover like iraqs former army) as well as the iraqi insurgents. America cant afford starting a world war.

  10.     
    #19
    Senior Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    Quote Originally Posted by juggalo420
    I think israel can take care of themselves, they have nukes themselves so thats a good deterent against iran nuking them. By the way im not against bombing iran cause it'll make the mullahs mad im against it cause it wont be that simple, Iran actually has a army and may still have chemical weapons left over from the iran-iraq war in the 80s, iran also borders both iraq and afganistan so are you willing to risking them using chemical weapons against our troops in those countrys. Even best case scenerio they dont use chemical weapons, guarentened theyll invade iraq, do you think our army can defeat the iranian army(which wouldnt be a pushover like iraqs former army) as well as the iraqi insurgents. America cant afford starting a world war.
    Howdy juggalo420,

    Bush has already stated for the record,that we will use every weapon in our arsenal,if attacked with wmd's-we will respond in kind. If Iran uses chemical weapons or any other wmd against US troops,we will probably respond with tactical nukes. America,has enough air assets in the region,and on stand-by,that we would be able to hold our own-just fine.

  11.     
    #20
    Senior Member

    To Destroy Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program,350 Targets Must Be Hit

    Quote Originally Posted by Torog
    Howdy juggalo420,

    Bush has already stated for the record,that we will use every weapon in our arsenal,if attacked with wmd's-we will respond in kind. If Iran uses chemical weapons or any other wmd against US troops,we will probably respond with tactical nukes. America,has enough air assets in the region,and on stand-by,that we would be able to hold our own-just fine.
    i have no doubt we would use nukes in responce to a wmd attack against our troops, but that doesnt make me feel better nor would the thousands of us troops who would die as a result of a chemical attack feel any better, not to mention the innocent iranians who would die due to our response. I think if we do attack iran it should be the last option, we should threaten the use of force in order to be sure they dont develope nuclear weapons, but we need a intenational force, think about it there about 120000 troops needed to secure iraq we would need at least equal amounts to secure iran, i dont think we have such amounts at our finger tips.

    happy holidays

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-26-2008, 04:30 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-02-2007, 01:19 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-24-2006, 03:05 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-13-2006, 07:45 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-09-2005, 02:05 AM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook