Quote Originally Posted by BlueCat
Really Ozark it is you that lacks research skills....NEWS FLASH its been resurrected! Of course it was buried I guess you missed the part where I said little Bush has done his best to hide the evidence....

Why would he do that Ozark? Why hide the records? hmmmmm
Iran/contra: 20 years later and what it means
2007-01-02 <---- you might want to note the date of this article

http://www.athensnews.com/issue/arti...story_id=26944
It means that some of people who gave testimony are still alive, and parts of whats on the record is still classified, there is something that they don't want the Iranians to know (like you our friends are, who spied for us in Iran etc.) the US Archives receives requests and postpones releasing Classified material everyday.
The people wrote your article know this, and they assumed (correctly) that you wouldn't. So they could get away manipulating you into believing this.

Ted Kennedy demanded that the US Archives wait 75 years before releasing all its files on the JFK shooting, What do you think he's hiding ?


Again you say what I am posting is a lie but you are not posting any proof as to why you feel it is. It has not been debunked because it is true.

You are telling me you do not believe Bush was involved in the Iran contra scandal?

There are no web sites for obvious reasons that say "Bush41 didn't sell weapons to Iran" I also couldn't find a web site that said "Blue Cat didn't sell weapons to the Iranians" Hmmmm.



Then you really are brain washed...what about Abrams was that "debunked" as well? Man I want one of those debunking machines!!

Elliott Abrams, an assistant secretary of state under Reagan, pleaded guilty in 1991 to two counts of withholding evidence from Congress (i.e., lying) over his role in the Iran-Contra affair. Bush I pardoned him; Bush II has appointed him to the National SecurityCouncil as director of its office for democracy, human rights and international operations.
yes, all six of them were pardoned, All six never denied what they did because they all believed it was legal, there was no coverup then or know, none of them ever said Bush was part of it.


Gee I wonder why he was pardoned? hmmmmmm
Explaining those pardons, Bush said the "common denominator of their motivation -- whether their actions were right or wrong -- was patriotism." They did not profit or seek to profit from their conduct, Bush said, adding that all five "have already paid a price -- in depleted savings, lost careers, anguished families -- grossly disproportionate to any misdeeds or errors of judgment they may have committed."


Maybe you should review tell me why did congress pass the Boland amendment, which cut off most military aid to the Contras?

Why did the Reagan administration circumvented Congress and popular outrage by waging a covert war and raising money for the Contras from private and foreign sources. One of the "neat ideas" Oliver North and his cronies concocted was to funnel profits to the Contras from the secret sale of U.S. arms to Iran--which was under embargo after seizing Americans as hostages. The discovery of this and other illegal schemes is what led to the Iran-Contra scandal,

Now who was vice president THEN?? Debunk that.
Yes, after 6 months of hearings in a DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED CONGRESS
Bush was not accused of anything, He wasn't even named as an "unindicted co-conspirator" the Government can name you and not have to prove anything. The entire US Government missed it, but you know the truth.

Fact that Bush's grandfather sold weapons to hitler to show a pattern in the Bush family. I guess that part escaped you. I notice you did not dispute either...
It didn't escape me, you repeat this nonsense because you think (selling weapons) it's part of his DNA ?