On the forum rules I have a suggestion of a rule 12, no questioning about the decisions of a mod.

The reason for this is because in all technicalities, there was no reason for the thread asking about why the sudam's hanging vid was nuked to be closed, because it broke no rules.

And also, when concerning it, rule number ten states:

No xxx stuff, disturbing pix

It says nothing about disturbing Videos, this should also be changed.

Do to rule 10 not be the reason the thread was closed, the closest rule it came to braking is rule 11.

Yet at the same time nearly every other thread containing links to sites (some actually more disturbing than this) are allowed. While one of the rules is no racism we are all equal, this is not brought over to the fact that we are all equal in our rights to post, and I ask that all these threads be nuked as well.

But that would take to much time off the mod's hands of course. There are not enough of them to take care of this, because many many threads contain links, some only about a link to a video. So either rule 11 should be altered, also since it is completley ignored when members direct others to sites for supplies, or done away with. Or part of it combined with rule 10.

Just saying, they could use an update.

Thanks.
wayoftheleaf Reviewed by wayoftheleaf on . Rule 12? On the forum rules I have a suggestion of a rule 12, no questioning about the decisions of a mod. The reason for this is because in all technicalities, there was no reason for the thread asking about why the sudam's hanging vid was nuked to be closed, because it broke no rules. And also, when concerning it, rule number ten states: No xxx stuff, disturbing pix It says nothing about disturbing Videos, this should also be changed. Rating: 5