9/11 US government conspiracy question

[harris7]

I too would like to see some CCTV footage of the impact. One reason I can think of of them not releasing any is that maybe there cameras were not working or recording at the time. Dummy cameras perhaps? two.

acctually there were 4 cameras viewing the building. 1 traffic camera, 1 gas station camera and two from a hotel. The FBI were at the locations within 5 min to remove all the tapes. There may have been more cameras owned by the pentagon

[SwirlyMass]

one of my biggest doubts about 9/11 was how someone hijacked that shit with box cutters and utility knives.

must have been 200 6 year old girls on both of those flights cause no real american man would puss out so much. fucking box cutters! hah.

Terrorist with a box cutter meets my fist:
my 1" stab wound at the most; 10% fatality.
me and 4 other guys stomping terrorists head until its 2D; 99.995% fatality.

I guess if they had hostages it would be a little different. but wtf who hijacks a plane in the air then kills the pilot when they plan on landing it and demanding money or something. so retarded.

Why do you people keep saying there is no profit. War=Profit and bolstered economy. Guess who got the defense contracts for the Iraq war: Haliburton. A company on par with Enron in my eyes. Guess who used to be the VP of this wonderful enterprise: Dick Cheney.

Must just be a coincidence huh?

[Breukelen advocaat]

one of my biggest doubts about 9/11 was how someone hijacked that shit with box cutters and utility knives.

must have been 200 6 year old girls on both of those flights cause no real american man would puss out so much. fucking box cutters! hah.

Terrorist with a box cutter meets my fist:
my 1" stab wound at the most; 10% fatality.
me and 4 other guys stomping terrorists head until its 2D; 99.995% fatality.

Plenty of planes have been hijacked in the past, with no resistance, simply because the passengers and crew thought that they would safer just landing wherever the hijackers wanted. Had the passengers known that it was a jihad suicide mission, there definitely would have been people trying to stop it - as they did on the plane that crashed in Somerset County, Pennsylvania

It never should have happened simply because the pilots' cabins should have been locked, Israeli-style.


http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://wtc.nist.gov
http://thatsjuststupid.com/911.htm

[peacetrain]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...+and+teller%22

And if you haven't seen Bullshit! Episode on the War on Drugs, it's on Google Video as well....good stuff. Besides the Global Warming episode, I tend to agree with these guys.

[xblackdogx]

There may have been more cameras owned by the pentagon

may have been more cameras???

WERE TALKING ABOUT THE PENTAGON!! THE MOST SECURE BUILDING ON EARTH!

IF YOU LOOK AT THE PENTAGON PICS I POSTED UP ON THIS THREAD YOU CAN SEE ALL THE CAMERAS ON TOP OF THE PENTAGON ROOF. THERE'S TOO MANY TO COUNT!

[trem0lo]

Conspiracy theorists take a bunch of random, speculative facts and weave their web with them. Then they make a documentary or website that seems plausible based on these facts.

"There were reports of this and that"
"Explosions were heard at the base"
"I read on the internet that blah blah blah"

You tell us not to believe our own government and yet you believe stuff on the internet. There are a thousand other facts you are ignoring, and that's just faulty reasoning.

[lazy smoker7]

lol this is funny, i think that bush knew it was going to happen but didnt care so he didnt tell any one. ( my fav presiendt is bill clinton, u kno the one that had an affai and said "he didnt inhale lol) just like back on dec 7, 1941 they knew pearl harbor was going to happen 3 hours before it happend and just dint give a fuck. or i dunno if i making sense or what

[harris7]

WERE TALKING ABOUT THE PENTAGON!! THE MOST SECURE BUILDING ON EARTH!

Good point. They Clearly could prove it was a plane from 43 different angles if they wanted to.

Conspiracy theorists take a bunch of random, speculative facts and weave their web with them. Then they make a documentary or website that seems plausible based on these facts.

You tell us not to believe our own government and yet you believe stuff on the internet. There are a thousand other facts you are ignoring, and that's just faulty reasoning.

You make a good point. You should realize that 95% of conspiracy theorists donâ??t believe what is proposed in loose change!
My view is rather simple, I donâ??t know what happened, but what I do know is that it isnâ??t what the Gov says happened. If you take the time to do some research youâ??ll find gaping flaws in the story, Flaws that no other information could explain (so donâ??t say were just selectively forgetting facts.).

Personally my biggest problems with the 9/11 story is the â??planeâ?� hitting the pentagon and tower 7 collapsing. More so, no tall building in history has fallen from fire! The first 3 ever happened on the same day, WOW what are the chances. Other buildings, for example the empire state building, have been hit by planes and didnâ??t fall.

Put a little faith in your abilities and a little time to research. Look at the pictures of the pentagon, Look at the small localized hole; look at the lack of debris in the area (remember how large a plane is). Then look at the â??official storyâ?� that the plane â??vaporizedâ?�. Vaporized means evaporated. The official story is that the fire was so hot that the metal evaporated!!! I know a lot about chemistry and even if this occurred the metal wouldnâ??t travel far, it would precipitate out of the air very very quickly at a short distance.
So if the plane did vaporize then molten metal would be found everywhere on the site. None was found. Ever heard of conservation of mass. Hmmm. Now what â??factâ?� that I forgot explains thisâ?¦

[Krogith]

http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle3995.htm

They have a Gain in this war.^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[harris7]

krogith, i dont have time to watch that video.

but i've seen the one in your sig. What do you think of it, I thought they took a pretty unbiased approach at it. i posted it on here b4