"You quote from an article not being addressed."

I see you can not comprehend what you read. Read what I said again man, and try to actualy open your eyes this time. Your grasping at something extremely small and trying to shift attention away from the fact that your protests, anti-war or not, are nothing even close to the exagerated claims of your oringinal thread starting post. Nor does your posting another protest later thats been a circus for many years, help to show that your protest is "enormous".

Your kind of tripping out over nothing. Your posts, both of them in this thread that your talking about, the original post, and the later reply with 16,000 protesters you think means something, both claim they are protesting military action. Are you trying to act like you don't know this, or do you really not get it? Open your eyes and look at the stuff you posted in this thread. It is anti-war protesting that is going on in them. Now maybe you can explain to me the importence of you not wanting to say there are anti-war protesters at your protests, when clearly there is? I would be willing to bet there are anti-war protesters at each and every one of your protests. So what!

" So you are saying that those events did not happen?"

Nope, I'm saying every little thing they could scrape up was used to make people like you think there was some kind of enormous movment out there. It's called propaganda. Unlike you, I didn't fall for it. I understand that there are propaganda outlets from all sides. I sometimes think some people believe one side is being truthfull while the other is all lies. It's sad that they can't see that both side are lying to them.

"Where is the truth you claim is missing in these demonstrations."

Not at your propaganda outlet, that much is for sure.

Your just really angry that I would have the nerve to question you, and that is clouding your judgement. Calm down a little and you might actualy see what it is your falling for.

Toker