Quote Originally Posted by Zimzum
The steel didn't melt. It was weakened enough to the point that the steel was softened up.. not melted. Around 1000'F it would have lost ruffly 50% strength. Steel is very conductive to electricity and heat. So an area around the support beams on fire with jet fuel would be absorbed by the beams. No 2 towers are built like they were with an internal frame support. Weight from above would have been enough to stress the weakened steel, then kinetic energy would do the rest. And do we really know if every beam was UL tested? Contractors do like to cut corners if it saves them more money. Look at Bostons "Big dig" and the incident that happened in the tunnel this last summer. Paneling fell off from a tunnel and crushed a car. People were cheap and didn't assemble it correctly.
at those speeds the jet fuel would of evaporated on impact Poof
those floors fell at the speed of gravity.
If the floors were just weakened they would of hit, slow down, fell, hit, slow down, fell, etc etc, all the way down. They fell at the speed of gravity, as did building number 7. No hit on #7 at all, but it did hold an observation floor to keep an eye on the wtc. I'd like to of seeen what that film contained.

People standing in the hole in the building, and it was hot enough to weaken steel? hold your hand over a hot stove. That might change your mind about how much heat human flesh can take.

We are trying to investigate, and those in power are hiding evidence, didnt want an investigation, and cleared that steel out before any of it could be inspected. I aint buying the governments claim, or the bush explaination.
Steve Jones, Professor of Physics, Bringham Young university, says 9-11 couldnt of happened the way the government says it did.

Your government has turned on you....., again.

dai*ma