Some of my issues with "intelligent design."

[harris7]

You gotta admit, it's a pretty intelligent design.

I mean who could come up with a design that actually evolves based on it's environment.

This is a valid point, Creationism doesnâ??t conflict with evolution. They are both true if god created the universe then evolution took place.

I don't see why things have to be logical to be true. If you have to have cold hard facts to believe, you're missing out on a wonderful feeling. .

I donâ??t necessarily believe that things have to be logical to be true.
Bush got elected, that wasnâ??t logical but itâ??s trueâ?¦:rasta:


But I do think beliefs should be based in logic.
I really donâ??t like using the word logic, people have put it up on to high of a pedestal.
Anyways, the opposite of logic is irrational.

So if you are not basing a belief on logic it is an irrational belief to have.

A belief produced by logic is a belief of which one has reason to have.

Billonfold, do you believe that beliefs need to be based in logic? Because that is what we are talking about here.

Regardless of the existence of god. Should one believe in god? I donâ??t think so. I think this because I believe there is a large gap between the evidence and our observation and drawing the conclusion that god exists.

What do you think?