Quote Originally Posted by Stemis516
theres two different types of evolution

micro and macro....micro being what some1 described with the flu virus example...macro being the theory that we evolved from apes

show me the proof of macroevolution plz....it has yet to be reproduced in a lab, and there is still no full blown proof of evolution over millions of years......sure a few things in humans have changed...for example some people have wisdom teeth some dont, but we have yet to prove evolving into a completely differnet spiecies

i respect your beliefs bro but to think that evolution in the sense of macroevolution is complete and infallible fact is just being ignorant....u give plenty of evidence to back ur point up and thats fine, but i can list plenty of evidence in support of God too...can i prove God exists???
I am currently at second year university biology level and starting third year genetics next semester.

There is no differentiation in science between the two, micro and macro. They are one and the same. There is one theory, Evolution, this theory has lots and lots of aspects to it. I??m sure 99% of them you??ve never heard of. (like genetic drift)

This distinction I assume was created by creationists because they know they can??t object to micro it??s too obvious. It??s pretty much the same tactic religious people always use.
Something else is proved wrong, so they just keep going with the other bullshit.


No one in science believes that anything ??is complete and infallible fact?
Only religious people believe things like that.

Scientists look at all the data we have, think up some ideas that explain it. And accept the best one. If more data is complied which contradict something. Our views change.
Eventually a ??theory? explains so much information and is constantly correctly predicting amazing things (eg, genetics) and this theory has little or nothing against it, we start to consider it fact. Just as we consider theories of electricity/gravity and so on, fact.

I cant ??prove? electrons exist to you. Nor can I ??prove? evolution occurred.

We essential accept the best solution. And even if creationism was equal to evolution in it??s explanatory ability (it is not) science always accepts the simplest solution (it??s called Occam??s Razor)


I suggest you inform yourself on the Theory before you try to speak against it. Because if everyone on here understood evolutionary theory, we wouldn??t be having these discussions.
harris7 Reviewed by harris7 on . Some of my issues with "intelligent design." I don't mean this as an attack on anybody for holding such beliefs, but I do bleieve it's essential to give serious and logical consideration to both sides of such a claim. It's nobody's "fault" for holding beliefs for or against god, but merely their belief that their reasoning is sound, is what's faulty. That being said... INTELLIGENT DESIGN: Before considering intelligent design, also consider this; does it not seem a bit suspicious to you that that we carry SO many behavioral Rating: 5