Quote Originally Posted by Stemis516
theres two different types of evolution

micro and macro....micro being what some1 described with the flu virus example...macro being the theory that we evolved from apes

show me the proof of macroevolution plz....it has yet to be reproduced in a lab, and there is still no full blown proof of evolution over millions of years......sure a few things in humans have changed...for example some people have wisdom teeth some dont, but we have yet to prove evolving into a completely differnet spiecies

i respect your beliefs bro but to think that evolution in the sense of macroevolution is complete and infallible fact is just being ignorant....u give plenty of evidence to back ur point up and thats fine, but i can list plenty of evidence in support of God too...can i prove God exists??? not a chance

faith brother....ur using it one way or another

I was under the impression that Macro and Micro evolution were terms coined by creationists. Regardless, both perspectives can be presented.

First of all, you can't reproduce large-scale evolution in a lab because it would require a lab with extremely varrying environmental factors all of which we can understand and take into consideration regarding their effects (which is damn-near impossible), several different species, and a few hundred million years to carry out the experiment. So no, it can't be reproduced in a lab.

Here's one interesting site regarding evolution on a larger scale. You may want to actually research the potential arguments before dismissing them as non-existent.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/


And once again, I'm not stating evolution as an infallable fact, I'm stating that it obviously has some degree of influence on the course of speciation, how much influence remains in question.

Still, creationist's greatest weapon is their distortion of all theory, law, and ideas; that being, trying to place scientists and creationists on equal grounds by perpetuating the false notion that any and every point of view is just "faith", that every idea and standpoint is all just a matter of faith and therefor it all is equally valid. I've yet to hear a real, solid creationist argument based on real research, sound logic, and reasonable interpretation of empiricle evidence. If anybody can prove to me, or at least present reasonable and existent evidence that god exists, I'll not only believe in your god, I just might dance a jig with joy.
mrdevious Reviewed by mrdevious on . Some of my issues with "intelligent design." I don't mean this as an attack on anybody for holding such beliefs, but I do bleieve it's essential to give serious and logical consideration to both sides of such a claim. It's nobody's "fault" for holding beliefs for or against god, but merely their belief that their reasoning is sound, is what's faulty. That being said... INTELLIGENT DESIGN: Before considering intelligent design, also consider this; does it not seem a bit suspicious to you that that we carry SO many behavioral Rating: 5