Results 1 to 10 of 87
Threaded View
-
12-12-2006, 03:00 AM #9
Senior Member
Some of my issues with "intelligent design."
I always like to point this out,
Originally Posted by Stemis516
In science evolution is considered FACT.
as well evolution isn't a theory saying that organisms changed and differentiated creating new theories.
evolution is an explanation as to WHY these things happened. there is no doubt that it has occurred, fossil records show it. Genetic rRNA maps show it.
PLEASE if you know any "logical" reasons to believe in creationism make a thread, i've never heard one. and i've looked good and hard 4 one.
i even made a thread asking for one, none came up. wonder why
also, he is arguing against intelligent design (i think you gots your terms mixed up). Intelligent design = creationism
as well, if you havenā??t seen the evidence then you havent looked. if you are interested i can give you links.
But you are correct about one thing, there is a huge difference between evidence and proof. In science there isnā??t proof, only evidence and disproving. This is the misunderstanding people have about science that allows creationists to make their arguments to the ignorant (no offence)
Similar Threads
-
The primary flaw in intelligent design
By Gandalf_The_Grey in forum SpiritualityReplies: 78Last Post: 12-11-2007, 10:02 PM -
another intelligent 9-11 debate
By VisionaryUrbanTactic in forum ConspiracyReplies: 21Last Post: 03-24-2007, 04:18 PM -
intelligent design > pure accident
By hazetwostep in forum SpiritualityReplies: 46Last Post: 12-30-2006, 08:03 AM -
Supreme Court deems "intelligent design" unconstitutional in public schools
By Oneironaut in forum PoliticsReplies: 28Last Post: 12-28-2005, 04:44 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online