Quote Originally Posted by BlueCat
I think it is a great idea. I have read some interesting articles on their site they have many reputable journalists. we must uphold free speech and if you don't agree with them that's ok too. You know it can be used to our advantage as well. you know the saying keep your friends close and your enemies closer or how about "know your enemies"...Maybe we can learn something. Its not like we don't have our propaganda spreaders just listen to fat ass Rush and O'lielly.

It is funny how people complain because soldiers are shown on AJ but there is no problem with showing the naked pyramid and other degrading photos of Iraqi people. It seems both sides are breaking the rules of the Geneva Convention.

WOW Masta C I am impressed you got it right. There may be hope for you after all
Howdy BlueCat,

You may as well be saying,if there was such a thing,that nazi news network,should have been allowed in the US,along with jap imperialist news,during WW2.

AJ is a foreign news biz,that is a mouthpiece for the enemy,they have no Constitutional right to free speech here,and as for Geneva Conventions,that only applies to uniformed soldiers,not terrorists and State actors.

Allowing AJ to further destroy the will to stand against the enemies of the Free World,is not good advice,we already have assets assigned to monitor them.

I have a major problem with AJ showing snuff films by the enemy,of our soldiers and as for the Abu Graihb photo's,they were shown by the liberal MSM,because they have no regard for the safety of our soldiers and citizens and because they're willing to cause any harm,in order to attack Bush.

Have a good one ....