okay just started reading this thread, so need a mo to catch up, just got up to this post, bong right on man, whenever people complain about iraq and say america had no business there (this is something that happens ALOT over here in australia) i always ask them if they feel the people of iraq were better off when saddam was in poer, most of em actually say yes, which prooves they dont know what theyre on about, bush put an end to all the shit saddam was doing, an end to all the rape rooms saddams men used to abuse young women (some girls as young as 11 or 12) and now iraq is so much bettewr off, sorry if by now this post is old news, just really wanted to comment on it,,,,,
You're kidding, right? We've got civilian guts splattered all over the sand, their homes and livelihoods destroyed, their women raped by soldiers (some as young as 11 and 12), and their country in ruins.

Yes Saddam was a bad egg, but he was a pussycat compared to the hell we've rained on regular 'joe iraqi' just going through life, trying to get by.

What kills me is people actually believe the Bush Administration is doing this because they really cared about the wellfare and freedom of the Iraqi people.

But then again, I heard a poll that said 40% of the American public thinks we're fighting in Iraq because they were directly responsible for 911. No wonder we were ignorant enough to elect a dunce like Bush into office.