Results 1 to 10 of 13
Hybrid View
-
11-29-2006, 10:34 PM #1Senior Member
The 'no-military option' fallacy
Originally Posted by Bong30
andruejaysin Reviewed by andruejaysin on . The 'no-military option' fallacy The 'no-military option' fallacy Jerusalem Post ^ | 11-28-06 | JONATHAN ARIEL A chorus is telling the free world that an Iranian A-bomb is something we will have to accept. This is simply not true. Over the past two or three years, as the full scope of Iran's overt and covert nuclear weapons programs has been disclosed, the possibility of preventive military action by either the US, Israel, or both, periodically comes up. Rating: 5\"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will, within limits drawn by the equal rights of others. I do not add \"within the limits of the law\', because law if often but the tyrant\'s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.\"-Thomas Jefferson.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
From Joining the Military Thread: A Wide Discussion on American Military
By higher4hockey in forum PoliticsReplies: 44Last Post: 09-21-2009, 06:53 PM -
Which Option Should I Go For?
By woohaa in forum Drug TestingReplies: 11Last Post: 03-15-2008, 05:53 PM -
what is my best option?
By houston09 in forum Drug TestingReplies: 0Last Post: 05-18-2006, 03:32 AM -
Post Hoc Fallacy
By nevaquit01 in forum ActivismReplies: 0Last Post: 05-10-2006, 06:51 AM -
Bush keeps Iran military option
By Great Spirit in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 04-20-2006, 01:43 AM