Results 21 to 30 of 33
-
11-25-2006, 04:20 AM #21
Senior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
well i am no expert. and I can see that either view point could create a article or video proving or disproving, simply by leaving out important info. So i'm not going to agree with you, or disagree because i havent done my homework.
Hmm, seeing as wikipedia agrees with you. I shall agree with you.
I do think they are very cool to look at though
-
11-25-2006, 04:33 AM #22
Senior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
I
...and i will agree with you on that. I think they're amazing...truely fine artdo think they are very cool to look at though
-
11-26-2006, 03:09 AM #23
OPSenior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
Yes, I'm aware of the facts you've pointed out but they're irrelevant to the discussion of the videos, which this thread is supposed to be about, which is about applying logic to a certain piece of evidence. You're speculating about past events and experiences.
Originally Posted by Hamlet
Sure.And since this is a public forum will I continue to do it anytime I feel the urge.
This is exactly what you've done.The rel spouting comes from those who make wild-ass claims without anything even halfway credible to back it up.
You have!We've been con'ed by preachers and snake oil salesmen long enough.
You're mixing your personal experience with both others and the present situation.
Yes, so stop preaching!A lot of warped minds have caused enormous damage preaching just this kind of pseudo-science and mysticism-from Heaven's Gate, to David Koresh to Charles Manson.
Then abide by it!I'm always going to call the foul when I see it.
-
11-26-2006, 03:55 PM #24
Senior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
Pretty vague rebuttals there ate. Any logical arguements and assertions?....but if you want to stick strickly to the video we can talk about that.
What are we watching? A top scientist from NASA, or MIT, or Cornell talking physics and investigating the anomilies? No, we're watching a self-proclaimed 'UFO Investigator' doing some really bad science, desperately trying to twist every flicker in some bad video into Alien intelligence from another planet. It's as shoddy as people claiming light flares on a camera lens are actually pictures of ghosts.
Why don't you see someone really prominent up there making the case for UFOs? Because they know its hogwash. Any time you do see someone with some real credentials talking about such things they're explaining that what you're actually seeing is ice coming off the shuttle, or a satellite orbiting, or a comet, or lightning on the earth. Of course the UFO cults will claim it's all
Government conspiracy to cover it up and only the brave few with no real education and off their meds dare expose the truth.
Even SETI, who are legitimate scientists trying to investigate such things, have found nothing yet. Why aren't they backing up this UFO researchers claims? Because a real investigation, time and time again, exposes less than glamorous facts.
Interesting how they included quotes from gnostic gospels. What does that have to do with the science? Nothing, but it does give you a strong clue where they're coming from. UFO cults who want to blend pseudo-science with religion to support foolish beliefs. Here's a little info from Wikipedia on UFO cults...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_cult
-
11-26-2006, 11:30 PM #25
OPSenior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
Ok???
Originally Posted by Hamlet
From what I have seen from you, more than you can handle/have thought of as of now!Any logical arguements and assertions?
You haven't done this!....but if you want to stick strickly to the video we can talk about that.
The video!What are we watching?
Your opinion doesn't fight the logic! Sorry!It's as shoddy as people claiming light flares on a camera lens are actually pictures of ghosts.
Because they are afraid, look into the matter and you'll realize this!Why don't you see someone really prominent up there making the case for UFOs?
I didn't know, thanks for notifying!Because they know its hogwash.
Yes, there is a reason for this, but you have not grasped it!Any time you do see someone with some real credentials talking about such things they're explaining that what you're actually seeing is ice coming off the shuttle, or a satellite orbiting, or a comet, or lightning on the earth.
It seems all the shiny lights and fancy outfits that these people wear, have convinced you that they are more than humans!
I don't believe you know everyone, but for those that you are speaking on directly, I hope you know what you're talking about!Of course the UFO cults will claim it's all
Government conspiracy to cover it up and only the brave few with no real education and off their meds dare expose the truth.
What are they looking for?Even SETI, who are legitimate scientists trying to investigate such things, have found nothing yet.
I can not answer that question! If I thought I knew the answers to all these questions, I would only be considered ignorant and arrogant!Why aren't they backing up this UFO researchers claims?
This has been proven otherwise, by the many many real investigations does, in all fields of "paranormal", which undoubtedly "changes lives" and opens people up to a broader spectrum of our reality!Because a real investigation, time and time again, exposes less than glamorous facts.
You are confusing your experience, (a very small one), with the larger one of Everybodies! This is a grave mistake when it comes to remaining logical!
Sure, interesting indeed!Interesting how they included quotes from gnostic gospels.
Thanks, I'll remember this!What does that have to do with the science? Nothing.
Yes, it seems they are "well-read", people!but it does give you a strong clue where they're coming from.
Not so much as you say it is, although maybe you've experience such a "cult", which is why I refered to you as the one with the "cult knowledge".UFO cults who want to blend pseudo-science with religion to support foolish beliefs.
But this thread isn't about that, so until then, please that else where thank you!
-
11-28-2006, 04:38 AM #26
Senior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
Any logical arguements and assertions?
Huh? If you're going to present a logical argument you'll have to write a coherent sentence and show us some logic.From what I have seen from you, more than you can handle/have thought of as of now!
Exactly what I've done? My assertions are backed up by every leading scientist, University, Government, and credible journalistic source on the planet. Verses a large majority of the UFO proponents spending their days on thorazine making wallets and baskets.This is exactly what you've done.
Ever see any of this malarchy in Science Digest or any of the other leading academic journals? Nooo...you would have to check out a copy of Fate Magazine, or the National Inquirer to get the scoop on these hot revelations. (or some homemade video on Youtube.)
Huh? Another vague sentence I'm trying to interpret, but yes, I do know what I'm talking about. I've been around many people suffering from paranoid psychosis and they all babble the same things about Government conspiracies, Aliens and UFOs, and sooner or later when they're hit rock bottom, they realize that they are indeed Jesus Christ. You'll see this same pattern over and over again.I don't believe you know everyone, but for those that you are speaking on directly, I hope you know what you're talking about!
Why such vague and elusive questions and statements if you have a logical argument as to why all this UFO weirdness is valid? What are they looking for? -- It's S.E.T.I....Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. They're looking for the same thing this goober on the film is looking for, but since they're credible scientists, they won't make any unsubstanciated claims. They will be the first to admit they don't have one shred of even halfway interesting evidence. And if they did have something extraordinary the first thing they would do is have their data checked, and rechecked by noted collegues for any errors or misinterpretations before proposing even a theory or conjecture.What are they looking for?
I beg your pardon but this has not been proven otherwise. The Amazing Rhandi has a million dollar reward for anyone who can come foreward and 'prove' any paranormal power. No one has been able to claim that reward yet.This has been proven otherwise, by the many many real investigations does, in all fields of "paranormal", which undoubtedly "changes lives" and opens people up to a broader spectrum of our reality!
You are confusing your experience, (a very small one), with the larger one of Everybodies! This is a grave mistake when it comes to remaining logical!
Remaining logical means examining credible evidence and research and drawing the most logical conclusions from that. Now, is this gentleman credible? All we know about him is he calls himself a UFO researcher. Does he have a degree in astrophysics? Is he the head of NASA? Do you know anything about him that would give his conjectures any validity whatsoever? No credible researcher in the world would come out and say that a squiggly light across a photograph is indisputable proof on Extraterrestrial Intelligence because they know it would be irresponsible at best, and dishonest at it's worst.
Oh, he wrote an E-mail to someone supposedly of note, and the source was nice enough to respond. Of course the subject of UFOs was never brought up in the initial Email, or the Sources response, obviously because the credible source would either have set him straight on his claims, or would not have bothered to reply at all.
I'll skip a few replies because they're strained so hard to be ambiguous (I suppose to sound guru-eque) that they make very little sense at all.
This thread is all about that.... and you, me and anyone reading this thread knows it. It's not any different than evangelicals trying to pass off creationism as science, and pretending the church isn't behind it. Only this gets even flakier if that's possible. So, again, since this is a public forum I'll keep it right here where it belongs.But this thread isn't about that, so until then, please that else where thank you!
-
11-29-2006, 08:27 AM #27
OPSenior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
This does not make you right!
Originally Posted by Hamlet
This is a lie, because you fear that you will be wrong!Verses a large majority of the UFO proponents spending their days on thorazine making wallets and baskets.
That's like asking if you'll ever see a drumset in a magazine that sells ice-cream, very illogical!Ever see any of this malarchy in Science Digest or any of the other leading academic journals?
Or how about NASA's archives, or the CIA's investigations!Nooo...you would have to check out a copy of Fate Magazine, or the National Inquirer to get the scoop on these hot revelations. (or some homemade video on Youtube.)
Sounds much more credible than your "scientist friends"!
You have interesting relationships!I've been around many people suffering from paranoid psychosis and they all babble the same things about Government conspiracies, Aliens and UFOs, and sooner or later when they're hit rock bottom, they realize that they are indeed Jesus Christ.
You mean "I have seen" this same pattern over and over again!You'll see this same pattern over and over again.
They are looking for different "evidences" here!They're looking for the same thing this goober on the film is looking for, but since they're credible scientists.
Yet, they'll tell you everything is ok, and that there's no reason to think on your own, and that they are the deciding source of all human knowledge.They won't make any unsubstanciated claims.
An "age old" joke, that people actually began to believe!
Yes! In this process, much successful evidence discoveries, goes un presented!And if they did have something extraordinary the first thing they would do is have their data checked, and rechecked by noted collegues for any errors or misinterpretations before proposing even a theory or conjecture.
Maybe you wish to play with him?The Amazing Rhandi has a million dollar reward for anyone who can come foreward and 'prove' any paranormal power.
Maybe they choose their playmates differently than you???No one has been able to claim that reward yet.
Or experiencing the "phenomenon" yourself!Remaining logical means examining credible evidence and research and drawing the most logical conclusions from that.
Why are you looking at the gentleman, look at his logic!Now, is this gentleman credible?
Yes you're right, for if his name was NASA, he'd surely have all the answers!Does he have a degree in astrophysics? Is he the head of NASA?
Not true! Don't be deceived!
I know his logic! As well as others!Do you know anything about him that would give his conjectures any validity whatsoever?
This is your opinion, and just look at the trail you've made above, it's based on illogic and emotional hatred to those who do not agree with you!No credible researcher in the world would come out and say that a squiggly light across a photograph is indisputable proof on Extraterrestrial Intelligence because they know it would be irresponsible at best, and dishonest at it's worst.
Even down to the point that if they do not wear a certain name tag, or work at a certain place, that you will not consider them "worthy".
You have shown yourself to have quite the "ego-based" disposition!
Thanks for allowing me to observe this!
This thread is all about that.... and you, me and anyone reading this thread knows it. It's not any different than evangelicals trying to pass off creationism as science, and pretending the church isn't behind it. Only this gets even flakier if that's possible. So, again, since this is a public forum I'll keep it right here where it belongs.
-
11-29-2006, 09:10 AM #28
Senior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
space amoebas, whoa
-
11-29-2006, 09:15 AM #29
Senior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
that would mean like
Originally Posted by Euphoric
there could be a whole ecosystem..
-
11-30-2006, 01:44 AM #30
Senior Member
Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -
Sorry ate, flippant snipes don't constitute rational arguments.
No one would love to see real evidence of something extraordinary more than me, but bullshit claims don't cut it. You're close on the emotional hatred remark though, but not for people who don't agree with me. If someone doesn't agree with me and can prove himself correct, I have no problem changing my opinion and agreeing with him. It's fakers, con-men and bullshit artists who bring out the disgust in me. I hold back any emotional distain for the mentally ill as I realize they are not well.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
NASA: All hope is gone, were f*cked
By rebgirl420 in forum Current EventsReplies: 25Last Post: 08-27-2008, 12:43 AM -
I am so high Nasa cant find me
By Dagelsssmoke in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 18Last Post: 01-11-2007, 10:31 PM -
Google-ish NASA
By beachguy in thongs in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 2Last Post: 10-30-2005, 06:17 AM -
Latest Evidence Closes Case on London Bombings
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 07-20-2005, 04:28 PM








Register To Reply
Staff Online