Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 -

[ate]

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?doc...3849446&q=nasa

This is yet another very good video, all filmed by NASA, and explained by some guy that seems to know what he's talking about. Very good film, very very interesting.

ate Reviewed by ate on 11-22-2006. Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 - http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5070476612863849446&q=nasa This is yet another very good video, all filmed by NASA, and explained by some guy that seems to know what he's talking about. Very good film, very very interesting. Rating: 5

[orangeman]

Wow. They lost me when they started talking. I sorta kept up but I just got lost again and again. I wish I would've known that they would talk so sophisticated, then I wouldn't have smoked so much to be amazed .

[harris7]

a lot of bullshit scientists talk in big language so people have trouble understanding them. IT is a TRICK used. MAkes me think its fake.

BTW i haven’t looked yet

[ate]

The fact that you talk about something, form opinions about it, and even make claims about it before you have seen it for yourself makes me want to disregard the next thing you say as biased. But I won't.

[harris7]

no it's ok i am biased.
I dont believe in UFO sightings. I do think there is other life (only based on probability)

i just dont believe any of the hicks who have seen ufo's or been abducted or any of that stuff

and BTW it is a trick commonly used. To persuade someone you must convince them of your authority (this is thought of as an accepted source of info)
they do this by using big words and saying they have degrees.

If you want someone to understand and judge what you are saying you say it in the clearest words possible, This is why scientific research is supposed to be understandable by anyone (they arn't good at this i note).

[ate]

Yes, but this thread is about what that video holds.

[mrdevious]

In my experience, such "documentaries" or similar videos are impossible to distinguish fact from fiction, as information and even interviews with qualified professionals are often edited to change the meaning and make completely different points than was intended by the interviewed expert.

[ate]

You can find the videos on youtube and nothing else required is the nasa footage. The film explains it, they do not show you something and tell you what it is. They show you what it is and how it's physically impossible for it to be anything else, it's an analysis of the footage with diagrams and the whole nine-yards.

[Hamlet]

The real evidence for UFOs is slim to none.

There's a guy who's hobby is making crop circles. He has to document his plans with drawings, dated,registered letters, etc..ahead of time for absolute proof that he was the one who created the crop circle, and still the UFO nuts are out there claiming aliens did it and calling him a lier.

The sad part is, if there really was any credible evidence for such phenomena, no one credible would touch it because all the kooks have the subject so throughly buried in 'fringe' bullshit.

[orangeman]

Actually you guys should watch the video all the way through. I mean even being the person that I am that video really has some possibility to it. I mean we are only humans and just looking at a picture of Earth...looking at all that endless blackness it just tells you that we are not alone. We have many mysteries, no one that's reading this knows what death is like because we've never died, have you ever met an "alien"? No, so how can you say they don't exist. When he explains light years and how long it'd take us to get to some other areas out there that really shows how disconnected we really are with the rest of the many places out there.